democrat tramps opening their legs and having babies by any man who asks

[Tucker]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x797806

aaaaaa5a (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Apr-02-11 05:17 PM
Original message
Black women using different sex partners to father multiple children.
   
A new study from the University of Michigan concludes that for all black women with 2 or more children in this country, a whopping 59% of their kids have different fathers.

The demise of the African American family is stunning and sad.

For all women in this country (black, white, hispanic etc.) with 2 or more kids, 28% of women had at least 2 fathers for their multiple children.

Full article here.

http://www.thegrio.com/news/multiple-baby-daddy-study-m...

LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Apr-02-11 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder how many children the fathers had.
   
Can we find statistics on that? And I don't think this phenomemon is limited to the black population.

Try reading it again. That part was covered.

spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Apr-02-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Not at all
   
I know several white women who've done the same thing. I have a nephew with three half brothers.

Liberal tramp.

FarPoint (585 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Apr-02-11 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like a GOP
   
Funded study at best. So what's the bottom line and why should we find this significant?

At U of M, a liberal mecca.  

GKirk (443 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Apr-02-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The thing that would make it significant is...
   
...if that results in children who are more likely to be brought up in poverty. But even then it is the woman's business not ours.

villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Apr-02-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
36. actually, children being brought up in poverty are a whole society's business
   
if you believe in retro values like, you know, empathy, societal cohesion, stability, etc...

You can take your "It takes a village" crap and stick it up you hoo-ha, you gun grabbing bitch.

aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Apr-02-11 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sorry. THEY'RE PUTTING THIS ON THE WOMEN??????
   
Did the study ask the men how many children they had by different women?

Did they ask WHITE men? Now my mom, for instance has three brothers and each one had a different mother.

I have an email and Facebook correspondent who got knocked by a brightly white Midwestern man who already had a pregnant girlfriend.

I mean did they do a thorough study? Or just attacked the women?

Another liberal tramp.

wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Apr-02-11 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Not in the article.
   
The actual title is: "'Baby daddy' study may draw unfair spotlight to black women"

The OP appears to have chosen to delete the "unfair spotlight" angle and add the prurient, curtain-twitching, pearl-clutching GOP angle for some mysterious reason.

Who gives a shit who sleeps with whom and how many kids they have by how many different fathers? It's nobody's business except the women, the kids and the fathers.

Promoting trampism.

Bunny accepting a Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Apr-02-11 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, I'm a white woman, with two kids, by two different men.
   
Guess I'm driving the USA train straight to hell.

Only two, you tramp. You picked the wrong screen name.

EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Apr-02-11 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. We'll see how many klan members post at DU?

blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Apr-02-11 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. So?
   
Explain to me exactly what is wrong with having children with different fathers? Are those children less loved? Are they somehow damaged? I'm curious why this is a bad thing?

A confused tramp. Some bad seed must have rotted her brain and she doesn't know who the donor was.

niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Apr-02-11 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. one of my friends has 5 grandchildren by four different men (all white)
   
one of the grandchildren has two children with different women, and a third pregnancy with yet another woman. not a black in sight

Someone raised a good liberal tramp.

Way too many sluts in this DUmp heap.

[BEG]

Why are they so defensive?  The study says that 28% of ALL women who have children have kids from different fathers. ALL includes white women.   

Of course this study doesn't mean that all women who have children with different men are "trampy". Some women get remarried and have other children, nothing wrong with that. But to deny the reality that liberal "morals" are not good for women or children that actually have to live with the consequences is well, to be a liberal.       

[MP_Sarge]

"not a black in sight"

A black?
A black what?
 
You mean a black PERSON?

[JohnnyReb]

Obama's momma was a liberal.....communist, tramp.

I read an article several years ago about the decline of the black family. It was probably by Walter Williams. It quoted statistics from the 1890 US census. The stats for white and black families were at that time about the same. Most were married, low divorce rate, very few unwed mothers, etc., etc..

....and the blacks that got to vote during that time probably voted "republican". I'm just guessing that.

[DumbAss Tanker]

Proving the old adage, "The Governmen gets more of whatever it's willing to pay for." 

True fore studies proving the impact of global warming, true for AFDC.

The DUmmies, of course, are unable to draw the connection.

[Carl]

Why are they so defensive?  The study says that 28% of ALL women who have children have kids from different fathers. ALL includes white women.   

Of course this study doesn't mean that all women who have children with different men are "trampy". Some women get remarried and have other children, nothing wrong with that. But to deny the reality that liberal "morals" are not good for women or children that actually have to live with the consequences is well, to be a liberal.       

Because it proves that instead of bettering society leftist public policy destroys it so therefore it must be hidden or denied.

[Airwolf]

What? No post from La Casa Del Buick?

[Boudicca]

"not a black in sight"

A black?
A black what?
 
You mean a black PERSON?

Good catch.

Maybe they meant  a black 3/5ths of a person.

[GOBUCKS]

No DUmmy ever understands the difference between "anecdotal" and "statistical". Never. Ever.
It is as mysterious to them as the difference between "its" and "it's".

[true_blood]

Bunny accepting a Donating Member (1000+ posts)    Sat Apr-02-11 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, I'm a white woman, with two kids, by two different men. Guess I'm driving the USA train straight to hell.

In my necks of the woods,.....we call that either being a slut or gold digger. Take your pic.