Saw a guy today sitting by the kids play area at the mall. BOUNCY

[CC27]

doc03 (30,757 posts)


Saw a guy today sitting by the kids play area at the mall

with an open carry pistol. The only way you know he
is a good guy with a gun is whether he starts shooting or not. The mall has a no weapons policy but the minimum wage unarmed security is not going to say shit. If he started shooting security would be first one out the door.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216756826

I thought malls are gun free zones?????? 

[Ralph Wiggum]

Not sure about everyone else, but I feel more secure seeing people open carry. Then again, I'm not a spineless, whimpering, leftist.

[67 Rover]

Absolutely amazes me that all the DUmmie bouncy's follow the headlines of the day.

[DefiantSix]

doc03 (30,757 posts)


Saw a guy today sitting by the kids play area at the mall with an open carry pistol. The only way you know he is a good guy with a gun is whether he starts shooting or not. The mall has a no weapons policy but the minimum wage unarmed security is not going to say shit. If he started shooting security would be first one out the door.

So, by your own criterion for establishing "good guy"/"bad guy" status, this one falls firmly in the "good guy" category. That being the case, I fail to see what's so noteworthy about this encounter, outside of your own pearl clutching reaction to his presence, DUmbass.

[ADsOutburst]

I would guess that someone with bad intentions would want to conceal the weapon until they use it, unless they can’t conceal it.

[CollectivismMustDie]

Quote
doc03 (30,757 posts)


Saw a guy today sitting by the kids play area at the mall

with an open carry pistol. The only way you know he
is a good guy with a gun is whether he starts shooting or not. The mall has a no weapons policy but the minimum wage unarmed security is not going to say shit. If he started shooting security would be first one out the door.

That's quite an admission.

The DUmmy admits to complaining about a good guy with a gun (because he isn't shooting), and admits through his criterion, that their desire to ban guns is a desire to take them away from the good guys (who aren't shooting anyone).

You can learn a lot from a DUmmy (when they're accidentally honest).

 

[franksolich]

Absolutely amazes me that all the DUmmie bouncy's follow the headlines of the day.

That's true, that's very true.

[FlaGator]

Absolutely amazes me that all the DUmmie bouncy's follow the headlines of the day.

It gives their myopic viewpoint something to focus on.

[Mr Mannn]

[3rd-try]

All of these mass-shootings have been soft targets. So somehow things get safer if the whole damn country becomes a soft target? Only to a radical leftist does this make sense.
You just don't see would-be mass shooters going to an active gun range to make their statement.

[jukin]

All of these mass-shootings have been soft targets. So somehow things get safer if the whole damn country becomes a soft target? Only to a radical leftist does this make sense.
You just don't see would-be mass shooters going to an active gun range to make their statement.

This is true but guess what there is another very common trait of mass shootings and this web site demonstrates this common trait with pictures.

https://mass-shootings.info/index.php

Can you guess what the other common trait is with mass shootings?

[ADsOutburst]

All of these mass-shootings have been soft targets. So somehow things get safer if the whole damn country becomes a soft target? Only to a radical leftist does this make sense.
You just don't see would-be mass shooters going to an active gun range to make their statement.

And therein lies the disconnect democrats have with everybody else on this issue; a criminal commits a  mass shooting, and democrats think that the people who should pay the price for that are regular gun owners.

[jukin]

And therein lies the disconnect democrats have with everybody else on this issue; a criminal commits a  mass shooting, and democrats think that the people who should pay the price for that are regular gun owners.

There is no disconnect. The democrats are lying. They want us unarmed and with no way to fight back when they come to kill us.

[landofconfusion80]

And therein lies the disconnect democrats have with everybody else on this issue; a criminal commits a  mass shooting, and democrats think that the people who should pay the price for that are regular gun owners.

There's a theory that most democrats can't legally own firearms because they can't pass a basic background form.  If they can't own guns,, then nobody should legally own firearms

[ADsOutburst]

There's a theory that most democrats can't legally own firearms because they can't pass a basic background form.  If they can't own guns,, then nobody should legally own firearms

First they came for the guns, but I said nothing because I was told gun owners were nutjobs who wanted to kill black people and children.