11
The DUmpster / Re: The thing to understand about the National Enquirer...
« Last post by Ralph Wiggum on Today at 06:11:42 PM »It is simply fodder for low information people to glance at while they're stuck in a line at the checkout.
Tommy Carcetti (43,172 posts)
The thing to understand about the National Enquirer...
…is you didn’t have to buy it to read it. you can steal it
You didn’t even have to consider buying it to read it. you just put your hand on the cover and absorb it
All you had to do was stand in the grocery store checkout aisle and there it was, with pictures and big headlines promising huge exclusive stories.
So even if you were just standing there, the chances it might subliminally affect you are notable. only if you are a low IQ dummy who’s brainwashed and can only listen to the party lines.
Hillary Clinton, a crook? most definitely and a liar.
Hillary Clinton, deathly ill? we should be so lucky
Donald Trump, the victim of a set up? most definitely, the left is deathly afraid he will get elected again and spoil their plans to destroy America
Tommy Carcetti (43,172 posts)
The thing to understand about the National Enquirer...
…is you didn’t have to buy it to read it.
You didn’t even have to consider buying it to read it.
All you had to do was stand in the grocery store checkout aisle and there it was, with pictures and big headlines promising huge exclusive stories.
So even if you were just standing there, the chances it might subliminally affect you are notable.
Hillary Clinton, a crook?
Hillary Clinton, deathly ill?
Donald Trump, the victim of a set up?
All of these things could be communicated without even an actual word being said.
And given the margin in the swing states in 2016, the subliminal impact of tabloid headlines on possible voters was much more substantial than you or I might want to admit.
ON EDIT: What Trump sought to use the Enquirer for as free advertising and disinformation was the same as what the Russians did for him with social media. Two different types of media but same intended result.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218889602
Until now, Belgium had the reputation for having the world's worst military marchers. However, it now appears that the British military is in strong contention for that title. As you can see its not just that the Brits in this video are horribly out of synch while marching, they also put little to no effort in swinging their arms. It's no wonder since many of them look their would prefer to swing their arms to grab a ham sandwich. Oh, and could the Brits exhibit just a slight bit of enthusiasm in their marching? I remember as a kid seeing the British Tattoo when it came to America and was quite impressed with their precision marching. Obviously such precision marching standards has declined drastically in Britain since then.
... Think about how he sat there in the WH watching the insurrection unfold on TV as our Congress had to hide from violent intruders. ...