The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: FunkyZero on June 24, 2022, 07:56:09 PM
-
... and guess what? not one word about law or legality... 100% guilt-bait.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216841482 (https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216841482)
Fri Jun 24, 2022, 06:27 PM
Star Member rzemanfl (28,957 posts)
I attended and completed law school years ago.
I stopped practicing law after 25 years. I thought I had lost all respect for the Supreme Court in 2000, but today takes the cake. The current court is a beneath contempt joke.
In my life I have known-
-A beautiful, scared, young girl who nearly died from a back-alley abortion.
-A woman who I impregnated, partly because selling birth control to unmarried people was illegal where we lived. The fact the child turned out to be a joy and she and her children still are, does not change the role the state played in that situation and the marriage that followed.
-A woman who had to fake being crazy to get a legal abortion. Many of you here knew her before her death.
-A woman who undertook to raise a mixed-race child born out of wedlock she gave birth to in a home for unwed mothers and did it well.
We now have a Supreme Court that is populated by a majority of liars who have no respect for precedent. I am disgusted. We need to rid ourselves of these scumbags and take this country back to majority rule.
I don't think thus DUmpass understand how precedent works and how it applies. It's argument is "we've done it like this for a long time whaaaaa!"\
fkin idiots I swear
Response to rzemanfl (Original post)Fri Jun 24, 2022, 08:40 PM
Star Member Mr. Evil (1,957 posts)
5. One thing is for sure.
None of those 6 depraved SC monsters will ever be able to go out in public ever again. Not unless they have an army of security with them. How enjoyable.
more of the same sprinkled with death and violence threats, standard DUmpass with lack of impulse control...
I often wonder why law enforcement doesn't follow-up on a lot of these violent morons.
-
... and guess what? not one word about law or legality... 100% guilt-bait.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216841482 (https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216841482)
I don't think thus DUmpass understand how precedent works and how it applies. It's argument is "we've done it like this for a long time whaaaaa!"\
fkin idiots I swear
more of the same sprinkled with death and violence threats, standard DUmpass with lack of impulse control...
I often wonder why law enforcement doesn't follow-up on a lot of these violent morons.
Yeah exactly. The DUmmy plays the 'I graduated law school therefore I should be regarded as an authority' card, then goes on to make legal arguments against the courts decision talks about nothing but his feelings and the experiences he draws those feelings from.
People like this should be kept as far from power as possible.
-
Yeah exactly. The DUmmy plays the 'I graduated law school therefore I should be regarded as an authority' card, then goes on to make legal arguments against the courts decision talks about nothing but his feelings and the experiences he draws those feelings from.
People like this should be kept as far from power as possible.
I saw that one. I thought the exact same thing. Really like how he skirts right on passed the part about having to take personal responsibility for getting a girl knocked up, because im sure, according to the DUmp, that's not fair.
-
Cool story DUmbass.
-
Fri Jun 24, 2022, 06:27 PM
Star Moron rzemanfl (28,957 posts)
...We now have a Supreme Court that is populated by a majority of liars who have no respect for precedent. I am disgusted. We need to rid ourselves of these scumbags and take this country back to majority rule.
Dred Scott called, DUmbass. He said you can stick your precedents up your arse, sideways and by the numbers.
Yeah exactly. The DUmmy plays the 'I graduated law school therefore I should be regarded as an authority' card, then goes on to make legal arguments against the courts decision talks about nothing but his feelings and the experiences he draws those feelings from.
People like this should be kept as far from power as possible.
Note how he talks about attending law school and how that makes him such an "expert legal scholar", :rotf: but conveniently sidesteps any mention on when he passed the Bar exam, how long he has - or more likely HAS NOT - been practicing law, and makes no reference to what type and how many cases he's actually litigated.
He may as well claim to be a long-time Matlock fanboi, and to have slept at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
-
One wonders if the Democrats are going to protest this like they did Brown vs Board of Education back in 1954.
-
I love when they lock themselves in with the ‘majority rule’ statements. I’m good with that!
Goodbye gay marriage. Goodbye anything transgender! Goodbye to a whole SLEW of liberal per projects!
Liberals would learn very quickly their pet projects are nowhere near as popular as they think.
KC
-
I love when they lock themselves in with the ‘majority rule’ statements. I’m good with that!
Goodbye gay marriage. Goodbye anything transgender! Goodbye to a whole SLEW of liberal per projects!
Liberals would learn very quickly their pet projects are nowhere near as popular as they think.
KC
"Democrats" turn anti-democratic real quick if they're in the minority opinion on an issue. Or when they lose elections.
-
FakeNoose (24,092 posts)
9. Of the NINE Supremes only one is a mother - can you guess who it is?
Amy Coney Barrett has 7 children.
Sonia Sotomayor was married at one time, but has no children. Elena Kagan never married, has no children.
(Ruth Bader Ginsburg bore 2 children.)
Of the 5 "no" voters on this issue, four are male.
Hmm.....
Those more acquainted with Ginsburg and her thoughtful, nuanced approach to difficult legal questions were not surprised, however, to hear her say just the opposite, that Roe was a faulty decision. For Ginsburg, the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision that affirmed a woman’s right to an abortion was too far-reaching and too sweeping, and it gave anti-abortion rights activists a very tangible target to rally against in the four decades since.
https://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-offers-critique-roe-v-wade-during-law-school-visit
-
I don’t know, and don’t care to know, but I think Kagan is gay.
KC
-
I don’t know, and don’t care to know, but I think Kagan is gay.
KC
Staunchly Bull-dyke gay.
-
By the way, that DU post contained no legal opinion except to say that the court doesn't respect precedent (I don't think I need to explain why that's a dumb opinion).
-
Because something is precedence doesn't make it right. It was precedence that a woman couldn't vote, a man could own another man or woman, and a baby could be murdered in the womb.
Some things that are precedence need to be struck down.
-
Fri Jun 24, 2022, 06:27 PM
Star Member rzemanfl (28,957 posts)
Bunch of stupid shit, blah blah blah...
We now have a Supreme Court that is populated by a majority of liars who have no respect for precedent. I am disgusted. We need to rid ourselves of these scumbags and take this country back to majority rule.
Dear DUmmy,
This country never was majority rule.
Try civics instead of activism.
-
oh, this dummy is telling the truth about the law degree, practice, but he is so old now that RVW wasn't even in the courts the year he graduated from law school.
https://www.martindale.com/attorney/atty-robert-j-zeman-1796097/
But he ought to know that there's been over 115 times SCOTUS threw out precedent.
Bob didn't mention Junior in his post - if you wonder what he turned out like, search for the name. :mental:
-
Nice collection of irrelevancies. These, OTOH, are relevant, since Pro-Abortion people smear Pro-life people as not caring about a baby after it is born:
* I know at least four Evangelical Pro-Life families who adopted children from mothers who gave birth instead of killing their babies, 10 children among those four families; Pro-Life people who put their $$ and homes where their beliefs are;
* I know at least two Evangelical Pro-Life families who, before marriage, got pregnant, the father married the mother, and their marriages are approaching 40 years in duration and counting; Pro-Life people who put their $$ and homes where their beliefs are;
* I know at least one Evangelical Pro-Life family who offered a pregnant unmarried teenage relative a range of options, from adopting her baby to moving her into their home and helping her continue her education so she could have a remunerative career that could support her and her baby; Pro-Life people who put their $$ and homes where their beliefs are;
* I know several Evangelical Pro-Life families who worked together to paint and decorate/furnish a home for pregnant single women who have been kicked out of their homes or otherwise have no home; Pro-Life people who put their $$ and homes where their beliefs are.
Progs want government to use OPM to kill babies.
-
Fri Jun 24, 2022, 06:27 PM
Star Member rzemanfl (28,957 posts)
I attended and completed law school years ago.
I stopped practicing law after 25 years. I thought I had lost all respect for the Supreme Court in 2000, but today takes the cake. The current court is a beneath contempt joke.
In my life I have known-
-A beautiful, scared, young girl who nearly died from a back-alley abortion.
-A woman who I impregnated, partly because selling birth control to unmarried people was illegal where we lived. The fact the child turned out to be a joy and she and her children still are, does not change the role the state played in that situation and the marriage that followed.
-A woman who had to fake being crazy to get a legal abortion. Many of you here knew her before her death.
-A woman who undertook to raise a mixed-race child born out of wedlock she gave birth to in a home for unwed mothers and did it well.
We now have a Supreme Court that is populated by a majority of liars who have no respect for precedent. I am disgusted. We need to rid ourselves of these scumbags and take this country back to majority rule.
Lawrence Tribe would love you, he's a left-wing Lawyer nutcase too.
-
By the way, that DU post contained no legal opinion except to say that the court doesn't respect precedent (I don't think I need to explain why that's a dumb opinion).
1. Plessy vs. Ferguson
2. Stare Decisis is not a provision in the US Constitution.
-
By the way, that DU post contained no legal opinion except to say that the court doesn't respect precedent (I don't think I need to explain why that's a dumb opinion).
1. Plessy vs. Ferguson
2. Stare Decisis is not a provision in the US Constitution.
The reason this scares leftist scum the way it does is that it shows that "settled law" from activist court cases that they never bothered to get codified as a Constitutional Amendment are ALL subject to reversal by justices who actually know how to read. Affirmative action, Gay marriage, hell, even Civil Asset Forfeiture and Kelo's Eminent Domain interpretations now have a basis for being reversed.
-
From Tess's link:
Reviews Not Shown
This attorney has chosen not to display the review(s) provided by their peers.
:lmao:
-
... and guess what? not one word about law or legality... 100% guilt-bait.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216841482 (https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216841482)
I don't think thus DUmpass understand how precedent works and how it applies. It's argument is "we've done it like this for a long time whaaaaa!"\
fkin idiots I swear
more of the same sprinkled with death and violence threats, standard DUmpass with lack of impulse control...
I often wonder why law enforcement doesn't follow-up on a lot of these violent morons.
Dred Scott was precedent. Damn SCOTUS for not respecting precedent. Stare Decisis and all that.
Oh wait...