I don't know if "bigotry" is the right word but "mewling" works just fine.
This is just more evidence that whenever the people have a clear choice set before them liberals lose and liberals then blame everything but their policies for the rejection of their policies.
Lady Gaga and the rest of Hollyweird can lecture audiences that paid 50-plus dollars to theoretically be entertained with tirades about how illegal immigrants deserve to come into the US and apply for welfare...yet, despite those lectures 70% of the populace agrees with AZ HB 1070.
Now, if a lectured, captive audience cannot be swayed to change its mind about illegal immigration it stands to reason that viewership where one must deliberately set a channel on the TV is strictly a matter of choice. It is an afirmative choice in favor of Fox and at the expense of its competitors such as MSNBC.
Liberals can't stand that because it is an rejection of what they believe and since they are so much better than us and smarter than us it grinds on their self-image to no end. That's why you're the brainwashed bigot and they must destroy Glenn Beck and Fox and Limabugh to break the spell so you realize once and for all how wonderful they really are.
Why do they deserve welfare? Because they're good people, ergo denying them their welfare is an attack against the good.
Why do they deserve to run health care? Because their smartererness says they are smarterer enough to do it and by rejecting it you are calling them not smart enough...and that just shows how stupid you are for not recognizing how smart they are.
Contrast that with conservativism's, "I'm responsible for myself."
It does matter if I'm good or smart or not...I'm responsible for myself. By implication you are responsible for yourself. You may be smarter than me and you may even be better than me but the predicate of self-reliance says your being smarter or better allows for you to prosper by those attributes, not dedicate your attribute to my support.