The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Texacon on June 25, 2020, 06:18:58 AM
-
https://democraticunderground.com/100213650001
demtenjeep (27,529 posts)
why did gooey Louie act like a toddler today?
all I could find was him banging a rock or something. What caused it?
I_UndergroundPanther (2,231 posts)
7. These assholes all of them
Need to be removed,they are like 2 year olds.
And if the speaker won't stop the mother****er banging shit,then obviously rules and decorum means nothing. What I would have liked to see is someone get the **** up and take away the object that's being banged from the rethuglican two year old piece of shit. They need to be treated like children and if they don't like it force them out.
Or when some republican piece of shit talks all the Dems bang things and say they would not respect the rules why should we and tap over all the republicans until they follow the godamn rules.
**** the high road we are dealing with ****ing 2 year old mentalities narcissistic wastes of skin.Treat them like the scum they are. Don't tolerate thier bullshit.
J_William_Ryan (1,026 posts)
5. The witness
was giving testimony critical of AG Barr, referring to him as a liar and being dishonest.
And like all authoritarian conservatives, Gohmert doesn’t like being in the minority and not in control.
As is the case with most rightists, Gohmert is a petulant child when not getting his way.
madamesilverspurs (14,141 posts)
10. Snottiness on steroids.
Jordan and Collins were their usual smarmy selves, as well. Respect is not in their repertoire.
.
Zambero (6,454 posts)
15. Lightweight Louie doing his best Nikita Kruschev impression
Kruschev's hissy fit consisted of removing a shoe and repeatedly banging it on a table at the United Nations during a speech he didn't care for.
20. It took 20 posts for one of them to tell the truth about why Gohmert was doing what he did. All of the above posters are talking about rules, laws, decorum, etc., but Gohmert WAS following the rules, it was Nadler who should have shut the witness down. Had the shoe been on the other foot these people would have been praising how brave their congressman was!
tblue37 (40,080 posts)
20. He was squawking that the witness had gone 2 minutes over the allotted time. nt
DUmmies, here's a clue, if the witness can't get out what they need to get out in their allotted time, maybe they should cut to the chase instead of trying to score pure political points.
KC
-
The hearing is a tantrum over the DOJ's sentencing recommendation in the Stone case. While Dems are quibbling whether the Feds should have pointed out that a "threat" Stone had made was not serious, they are ignoring the simple fact that the judge was completely familiar with the matter and had the discretion to give the augmented sentence the Dems wanted. The judge, not the DOJ, decided what Stone's sentence would be.
The Dems' witness was a disappointed member of the Mueller team. The Rs' "witness" is the judge who decided that the DOJ's reasoning was correct.
-
https://democraticunderground.com/100213650001
20. It took 20 posts for one of them to tell the truth about why Gohmert was doing what he did. All of the above posters are talking about rules, laws, decorum, etc., but Gohmert WAS following the rules, it was Nadler who should have shut the witness down. Had the shoe been on the other foot these people would have been praising how brave their congressman was!
DUmmies, here's a clue, if the witness can't get out what they need to get out in their allotted time, maybe they should cut to the chase instead of trying to score pure political points.
KC
If the guy could not cut to the chase then he was framing the narrative rather than answering the question.
-
If the guy could not cut to the chase then he was framing the narrative rather than answering the question.
Circumlocution with the purpose of deception.