True
time:
Story of my child's claim being denied initially but paid eventuallyMy daughter had Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis. It's a rare disease, sort of cancer-like but not a cancer, and at the time there were about 5000 known cases worldwide. The medical literature available to us at the time said that for children under age 2 the death rate was ~1/3. Our daughter was a month short of her 2nd birthday. Fortunately, one of the specialists in the disease practiced at UCSF Hospital in SF. We went there for the initial tests to see the extent of the disease and for treatment, ~6 months of weekly chemo. My health insurance did pay for that. Perhaps the stature of UCSF was a factor in that. This
is about the aftermath a few months after she went off the chemo.
LCH does return, sometimes, and an early sign of this is diabetes insipidus. This is unusual thirst and frequency of urination. We were warned of this and instructed to come to the hospital immediately if that seemed to be happening. It seemed like it did (daughter was still just 2YO) and we had her admitted to UCSF hospital for the better part of a day for observation. She was (and still is, some 3 decades later) OK. My insurance declined to pay for the hospital stay. We appealed and were turned down. We tried calling, without success. We called against, this time getting an RN. We asked her to get into contact with our daughter's doctor at UCSF - which we knew he was willing to do. She did, and being a medical professional talking to a medical professional, she was persuaded by the doctor that as odd as the basic facts seemed, the hospital stay was medically justified, and the insurance company paid the claim.
angrychair's
, if not fiction, displays a lack of effort on
angrychair's part. CRMO is real, inherited, classified as autoinflammatory and as "rare", but it is
known to be real. An insurance company declining an initial claim could be realistic, but I think that getting someone with a medical background at the company to talk with the actual doctor would have resulted in the insurance company paying claims according to the terms of the policy.
angrychair's
does not mention such an effort having been made.
Seattle Children's Hospital is affiliated with the University of Washington School of Medicine, so the doctor may have chosen not to contact the insurance company, but to treat the case for the purpose of students and staff learning about the disease.
At worst, wrt the relevant insurance company,
angrychair's
is an example of
Six O'clock News syndrome. The millions of claims medical insurance companies do pay won't get on the Six O'clock News or in the newspapers. It's the uncommon/rare exceptions that do, and even then should be taken with a block of salt, given "reporters'" biases and laziness/sloppiness/selectivity.