"The Discovery Communications headquarters hostage crisis occurred on September 1, 2010 at the headquarters of Discovery Communications in Silver Spring, Maryland, United States, when 43-year-old James Lee, armed with two starter pistols and an explosive device, took three people hostage in the building's lobby. After nearly four hours, Lee was shot dead by police and all the hostages were freed. Lee's motive was believed to have been grounded in environmental activism.
Oh, wait, nobody died."
Nobody died because the cops shot Lee before he could detonate the bomb that he had strapped to his chest.
btw, DUmmies, just making inferences about who the psycho might be largely motivated by your own prejudices rarely turns out to be right.
In the interest of fairness, here's a time when I myself was guilty of that:
When the Times Square car- bomb attempt happened a couple years ago, I was intially rather convinced that the guilty party would turn out to be one of those "Black bloc" Anarchist freaks. I too had some reasons to believe this:
1. It happened on May 1, aka May Day/ International Workers' Solidarity Day, the most sacred holiday of the year for Anarchist/ Communist vermin, a holiday which they like to celebrate with vandalism, violence, rioting, and acts of terrorism.
2. The bomb was planted near the Theater District, where the wealthiest and most high- profile New Yorkers go for entertainment and fine dining. Keeping in mind that Anarchist/ Communist scumbags believe as one of their central philosophies that all wealthy people are oppressive, pure-evil monsters who all deserve to die for "Crimes against social justice," the Theater District would have made a prime target for Black bloc types trying to kill as many 1%ers as possible.
3. Surveillance cameras near the site showed a man ducking into an alley, quickly removing his jacket, stuffing it into his backpack, and leaving. This fit with Black bloc anarchists' strategy of showing up to the sites of their "Protests" wearing layers of clothing, then rapidly ducking into alleys and shedding those layers as they make their escape in order to make it harder for police to identify and arrest them.
Of course, I turned out to be wrong. The jacket guy was just a bystander, and the would- be bomber turned out to be (Big surprise here) a Muslim extremist.
The point is, trying to figure out who to blame for a terrorist act based simply on stereotypes and a lack of concrete facts rarely if ever turns out to be right, and usually just makes you look like an idiot. Then again, the DUmmies are used to saying things that make them look like idiots, so it's all good.