I've seen Judge Napolitano respond on this a couple of times in the past day or two, and while critical he is being ridiculously nice to the President in his comments. Hey Judge:
1. Being President of the Harvard Law Review is an elective position, like being President of a student bar association or even a county bar...i.e. a post held by the person who wants to do the most to get it, not by any measure of merit. It would be a different story if he'd had anything published, possibly, but I'd strongly suspect it was ghostwritten if he had, like his 'books,' but apparently no faculty 'mentor' wanted to risk his or her tenure by possibly getting caught in any such ethical breach.
2. The intellectually-reviled G. W. Bush and the the unprincipled and none-too-bright rascals of the Kennedy clan all graduated from major Ivy League schools, mainly Harvard, as well, it really didn't speak a damned syllable for their awesome scholarship. By the way, what were Obama's grades...?
3. Isn't he suspended from practice by a consent order? I don't believe he ever 'really' practiced law, so your estimation of his legal acumen is without any evidentiary foundation.
4. 'Constitutional scholar' my left ass-cheek. What learned papers has he written? What famous cases did he brief as an advocate? None, you say? All this claim of 'Constitutional scholarship' goes back to being a guest lecturer at 'One of the finest law schools in the country' - well, BULLSHIT!!! He got the gig because he was a State political figure in what is probably the most corrupt city and state in America, and universities are as politicallly aware as any bureaucratic organization there is, especially when they think they can curry favor. He was a night school adjunct instructor teaching a developed curriculum in a standard class, which most third-year law students could pull off successfully given a suitable diguise and a reason to do it.