Well, folks, the situation down in Bellevue's been explained to me this morning by a former resident of Bellevue--I myself never lived in, or hung around, Bellevue--and he's not quite up-to-date on things down there, but I'll tell you what he said, and anyone closer to the scene of action is free to correct him (or me) if we got something wrong.
The city council in Bellevue is non-partisan, despite that party affiliations are shown on the filing papers (I dunno if the party affiliation shows up on the ballot, and neither does he).
This means the top two candidates in the primary advance to the November ballot.
Currently there's two (R)s, one (L), and the big guy running.
One might assume that with two (R)s, the (R) vote gets split, and the big guy slips in as one of the top two.
Of course he would lose in November, but it would be nice to abort this laughingstock of a campaign as soon as possible, in the primary, with the big guy running third or fourth.
Which would be a kindness to the big guy, who's already got a boatload of woes and problems, not having to campaign after that.
Leaving two (R) or one (R) and the (L) on the November ballot.
The primary in Nebraska is Tuesday, May 15, about two months hence.