Who is harmed by the camps? Who would want to have them gone?
This is for the old dude, when he finally comes over here to lurk; everyone else can ignore this comment, as it's aimed only at the old dude.
The old dude filmed some flooding on his spread over there in Maryland, in the third-most affluent county in the whole United States, last summer. I suppose most were just watching the water, but I was eyeballing the real-estate. The old dude has some pretty nice property, including forests and of course the river on it.
I dunno how big the old dude's spread is, but probably it's larger than the one on which I live (but only rent, not own), which is circa 900 feet from the county road on the other side of the William Rivers Pitt to the banks of the river, and circa 1250 feet from the southern edge of the north meadow to the northern edge of the south meadow. The old dude's place looks as if that's not even a side yard for him. It looks pretty nice, with all the flora and fauna; an ideal rustic campsite for enjoying nature.
The old dude's trying to claim the occupiers are neat and orderly, clean as a pin.
If the old dude really believes that, I suggest he invite the occupiers to hang around his place.