Author Topic: primitives discuss handling infant excresence  (Read 344 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58694
  • Reputation: +3069/-173
primitives discuss handling infant excresence
« on: December 15, 2011, 07:53:08 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/112896

Oh my.

Quote
onpatrol98 (1,190 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail

What is the most environmentally sound way to handle baby poop?

Seriously...what kind of diapers do you use or don't use?

Quote
gejohnston (3,901 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail

1. cloth diapers

the down side is the cleaning.

That'd be franksolich's guess too.

Quote
onpatrol98 (1,190 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail

2. Cloth was the only one I could think of also...

Cloth was the only thing that came to mind for me, too. It just seems like someone would have thought of another alternative and marketed it. I mean...the average family with children must go through boatloads (another word came to mind) of diapers.

Quote
Curmudgeoness (5,077 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail

3. I'm too old to have recent experience, so cloth diapers are all I know.

The up side: They are reuseable. They do last a long time. They force you to change the baby more often, which is better for the baby. Kids will often toilet train easier because the diaper is not comfortable, while the disposables keep moisture away from the baby. It keeps all those diapers out of the landfill. And really, have you ever seen the goop that is inside a diaper??? No, I don't mean the baby's mess, I mean the gel that the diapers are made of---scary. I saw a disgarded diaper that had broke open and that gel was disgusting---it looks like a hazardous material to me.

The down side: They are labor intensive, with rinsing and washing. You will use a lot more of these diapers because you cannot leave a baby in a wet diaper---and especially newborns will be going through them often. They do not wick moisture away from the baby (hence the changing more often). The rinsing and washing uses water---and I have heard some environmentalist who are opposed to cloth for this reason. I suppose that it depends on whether you are living in an area with water issues or not on this one. Although I consider myself an environmentalist also, I don't have a problem with water use, since the water can be reused after treating while a landfill will be there forever---or close to it.

It all comes down to what your comfort level is. Don't let yourself be forced into using one or the other diaper. Consider your time and what you can do.

And the most environmentally sound way would be to let the baby be naked all the time, if you ask me. I guess that wouldn't work well inside a house!
apres moi, le deluge

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15750
  • Reputation: +1724/-170
Re: primitives discuss handling infant excresence
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2011, 10:50:05 AM »
The way major democrat mayors did it was to send in government employees in hazmat suits.
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58694
  • Reputation: +3069/-173
Re: primitives discuss handling infant excresence
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2011, 10:51:10 AM »
The way major democrat mayors did it was to send in government employees in hazmat suits.

Good one, sir.

Awesome.
apres moi, le deluge