Author Topic: Liberal massaging of facts - again?  (Read 2035 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CG6468

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11493
  • Reputation: +540/-210
Liberal massaging of facts - again?
« on: May 20, 2011, 12:31:51 PM »
Quote
Extinction reports are greatly exaggerated
Thursday, 19 May 2011

by Iain Coleman
Cosmos Online

EDINBURGH: Predictions of how many species go extinct when habitat is lost are fundamentally flawed, according to new research.

Many estimates of extinction rates due to human activity, including those used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), will now have to be revised downward.

"We have proved mathematically where this overestimate comes from, and in this paper we provide a correct method," said Fangliang He of Sun Yat-sen University in China, co-author of the paper published in Nature this week.

"Based on the mathematical proof and empirical data, we prove that the overestimate can be as much as 160%, so previous estimates should be divided by roughly 2.5."

A mathematical flaw

The extinction of species when their habitats are lost is the dominant problem facing conservationists today, and human activities including climate change are destroying habitats at an unprecedented rate.

The most widely used method for estimating extinction rates is based on the species-area relationship (SAR). If you sample a particular area, you count a certain number of species. If you then increase the area you are sampling, the number of species you count will also increase.

The resulting curve of species against area is the SAR. Until now, it has been commonplace to estimate extinction rates by moving backwards along this curve: if the habitat shrinks, the number of species in it was also assumed to shrink in an exact reversal of the SAR.

160% Exaggerations?
Illinois, south of the gun controllers in Chi town

Offline Thor

  • General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!
  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13103
  • Reputation: +362/-297
  • Native Texan & US Navy (ret)
Re: Liberal massaging of facts - again?
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2011, 09:32:48 AM »
IMO, a species will either assimilate to the new environment, move or die off. Dying off is generally the very last thing a species will do. Look at bear & deer. They have either assimilated to the new environment, moved, or sometimes, even both. It's pretty much against nature for a species to just die off.
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."- IBID

I AM your General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!

"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated."-Thomas Jefferson