We have a slapfight brewing.
BlueFireAnt (19 posts) Mon Mar-31-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Should it be your friend's right to carry the family planning further?
Could she "abort" her child if she sees she can't care for him at 6 months old? Either way she's killing a baby she can't take care of.
I don't think someone should keep a baby that they can't take care of or even don't want, but there are too many people out there that want children and can't have them. My niece was adopted at 45 minutes old, so I am kinda biased on this issue.
Alert | Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink | Edit | Reply | Top
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Mon Mar-31-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. i do not think any woman owes anyone
Edited on Mon Mar-31-08 08:13 PM by musette_sf
the use of her uterus because "there are too many people out there that want children and can't have them".
too bad.
firstly, there are many children available for adoption... if "perfect healthy white infant" is not a criterion.
secondly, what did people do in the old days when they could not have children? some adopted, some got closer with children in the extended family, some got involved in pro-bono activities helping children. having a child is NOT a G-d given right. people need to adjust to their circumstances and do the best they can within them, not try to force the world to accommodate their sense of entitlement.
and i resent your psuedo-scientific "killing a baby". in pregnancy terminations, no babies are killed. please be scientific, and supportive of freedom of choice and Constitutional right to privacy in health care matters, in the Choice forum on Democratic Underground. there are plenty of anti-woman, anti-choice sites to chit-chat if you don't support choice and freedom.
Alert Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
they really see that as one in the same, don't they?
Don't miss this exciting episode of "Cripple Fight".