I assume this truck is displaying a murdered unborn baby. Should not one who supports the murdering of unborn babies be applauding the advertisement? Instead of being repulsed by the image, should not thesupporter just see it as the photo of the end results of a practice she endorses?
It doesn't make sense to be disgusted by that which you support. I support the removal of tumors. A photo of a removed tumor may not be the prettiest sight to see, but I certainly wouldn't be disgusted or outraged by it. In fact, I'd be happy to know it was removed.
That'd be because a tumor is generally a bad thing that can be fatal. A killed, dismembered human being is not.
They are repulsed by the image(s) because it is SICKENING, and they know it is.
This is a HOT button for me.
I have debated this issue elsewhere, in a swarm of the libtards, and *I* linked to an image of a killed, dismembered baby in which case the webby removed my link...because it was too grotesque. Instead of admitting that they are sick and vile for supporting something sick and vile, they instead try to twist it around on the people/person who shows what a killed baby looks like. They baby killers did that, not the person showing the image.
They do this because they are cowards and liars. They want to run from the reality of what abortion really is.