Author Topic: Supreme Court Rulings today -  (Read 1328 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gina

  • Tinker Twat
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13088
  • Reputation: +830/-102
  • Short Bus bound!
Supreme Court Rulings today -
« on: June 30, 2014, 10:10:13 AM »
 :popcorn:  Should be fun to watch the Dump today

Quote
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court says public sector unions can't collect fees from home health care workers who object to being affiliated with a union.

The justices on Monday said collecting the fees violates the First Amendment rights of workers who are not union members.

The ruling is a financial blow to labor unions that have bolstered their ranks in Illinois and other states by signing up hundreds of thousands of home health care workers.

The case was brought by a group of Illinois in-home care workers who said they didn't want to pay fees related to collective bargaining. They claimed the "fair share fees" violate their constitutional rights by compelling them to associate with the union.

Lower courts had thrown out the lawsuit.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUPREME_COURT_UNION_FEES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-06-30-10-08-45



Still waiting on the Hobby Lobby portion
Quote
The Supreme Court won't strike down Obamacare's contraception mandate, but a ruling for the law's challengers could still render the policy toothless for millions of women.

The justices are set to rule any day now in a challenge to the birth-control mandate, and any decision against the policy would have ripple effects far beyond the two companies that filed this lawsuit. Just how far, however, depends on how broadly the Court rules—and it has plenty of options.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2014, 10:14:00 AM by Gina »






"An army of deer led by a lion is more to be feared than an army of lions led by a deer." Phillip of Macedonia, father to Alexander.

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10935
  • Reputation: +535/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
Re: Supreme Court Rulings today -
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2014, 10:22:08 AM »
Hobby Lobby wins.

Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline Gina

  • Tinker Twat
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13088
  • Reputation: +830/-102
  • Short Bus bound!
Re: Supreme Court Rulings today -
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2014, 10:22:44 AM »






"An army of deer led by a lion is more to be feared than an army of lions led by a deer." Phillip of Macedonia, father to Alexander.

Offline Gina

  • Tinker Twat
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13088
  • Reputation: +830/-102
  • Short Bus bound!
Re: Supreme Court Rulings today -
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2014, 10:23:25 AM »
Just heard!!  :yahoo: 






"An army of deer led by a lion is more to be feared than an army of lions led by a deer." Phillip of Macedonia, father to Alexander.

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10935
  • Reputation: +535/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
Re: Supreme Court Rulings today -
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2014, 10:24:20 AM »
Closely held corporations cannot be required to provide contraception coverage. - See more at: http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_30_2014#sthash.5JmmzmNQ.dpuf
Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline Wineslob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14438
  • Reputation: +779/-193
  • Sucking the life out of Liberty
Re: Supreme Court Rulings today -
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2014, 10:52:29 AM »
Oh dear. Seems the O'stration has pissed off the SCOTUS. Things just haven't been going Obummers way.

 :loser:
“The national budget must be balanced. The public debt must be reduced; the arrogance of the authorities must be moderated and controlled. Payments to foreign governments must be reduced, if the nation doesn't want to go bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance.”

        -- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 55 BC (106-43 BC)

The unobtainable is unknown at Zombo.com



"Practice random violence and senseless acts of brutality"

If you want a gender neutral bathroom, go pee in the forest.

Offline longview

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3292
  • Reputation: +224/-34
Re: Supreme Court Rulings today -
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2014, 11:01:37 AM »
Both of these rulings are very good news!   :yahoo:

Offline Dori

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7964
  • Reputation: +406/-39
Re: Supreme Court Rulings today -
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2014, 11:31:50 AM »
Happy Day   :yahoo:

Four opinions that went against the commies. 





“How fortunate for governments that the people     they administer don't think”  Adolph Hitler

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Supreme Court Rulings today -
« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2014, 11:49:52 AM »
Oh dear. Seems the O'stration has pissed off the SCOTUS. Things just haven't been going Obummers way.

 :loser:

<snicker>

Alito hasn't forgotten the 2010 SOTU.

Suck on it, Barry. Oh, wait....you probably have already...   :bolt:
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: Supreme Court Rulings today -
« Reply #9 on: July 03, 2014, 08:28:25 AM »
And here comes the next shoe to drop!

Quote
By the way, the D.C. Circuit might nuke ObamaCare tomorrow

posted at 8:21 pm on July 2, 2014 by Allahpundit

Remember the Halbig case? If not, catch up right now by re-reading this post from January, written after a D.C. district court judge ruled in Obama’s favor. O-Care is a famously complex law but the lawsuit that could end up demolishing it is surprisingly simple. In a nutshell, there’s a line buried deep in the statutory text that says federal subsidies for insurance premiums will be available to anyone who buys a plan on “an Exchange established by the State.” Question: Does Healthcare.gov, the exchange built by the federal government after 34 states refused to build their own exchanges, qualify as an “Exchange established by the State”? Or do only state exchanges qualify? If it’s the latter, then millions upon millions of people who’ve signed up for O-Care through Healthcare.gov since October in the expectation that Uncle Sam will be paying part of their bill are in for a nasty surprise. The only fix that’s available (unless His Majesty tries some executive gambit, of course) is for Congress to amend the statute so that subsidies are available on the federal exchange too, but what are the odds of the House GOP agreeing to that? If the D.C. Circuit, which is set to rule any day now on the appeal of the earlier ruling, sides with the challengers against O, consumers will be forced to either come up with the money for their premiums themselves or drop their coverage. And if most of them choose to drop coverage, leading to a mass exodus of healthy people from various insurance risk pools, suddenly the White House is facing a death-spiral problem where hiking premiums on the remaining enrollees is the only way to pay for all the sick people still in the pool. That’ll lead to more dropped coverage, which means even higher premiums, and then it’s spiralmania.
 
It’s a magic bullet, aimed right at the heart of ObamaCare. What will the D.C. Circuit do? TPM wonders:

Quote
The challenge was initially written off by some as a fool’s errand because there’s a lack of evidence that the Democrats who crafted and passed the Affordable Care Act intended to block subsidies on the federal exchange, which was designed as a backstop on behalf of the states. (They’ve signed a brief saying as much.) But the challengers seized on an ambiguity in the language of the statute which says the subsidies are to be provided by “an Exchange established by the State.”
 
“If the legislation is just stupid, I don’t see that it’s up to the court to save it,” Judge A. Raymond Randolph said during oral arguments in March.
 
Randolph, a George H.W. Bush appointee, said the text of the statute “seems perfectly clear on its face” that the subsidies are confined to state-run exchanges. Carter-appointed Judge Harry T. Edwards slammed the challengers’ claims as “preposterous.” So the deciding vote appears to be with George W. Bush-appointed Judge Thomas B. Griffith, who wasn’t resolute but sounded unconvinced of the Obama administration’s defense, saying it had a “special burden” to show that the language “doesn’t mean what it appears to mean.”

Wouldn't it be something?  I think the DUmp would go into full meltdown over this! :yahoo: :whistling: :fuelfire:

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/07/02/by-the-way-the-d-c-circuit-might-nuke-obamacare-tomorrow/
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1997/-134
Re: Supreme Court Rulings today -
« Reply #10 on: July 03, 2014, 09:56:45 AM »
And here comes the next shoe to drop!


Wouldn't it be something?  I think the DUmp would go into full meltdown over this! :yahoo: :whistling: :fuelfire:

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/07/02/by-the-way-the-d-c-circuit-might-nuke-obamacare-tomorrow/
What does melted down DUmmie look like....what's her names puke stew?
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: Supreme Court Rulings today -
« Reply #11 on: July 03, 2014, 08:19:17 PM »
What does melted down DUmmie look like....what's her names puke stew?

Someone here has that gif of the exploding head . . . ! :whistling: :fuelfire:
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.