1) Equal treatment under the law is a foreign idea to you? Right now, as far as I know-- due to Lawrence v. Texas. . .being homosexual, bisexual or even pansexual is legal. You may not be able to marry that person, but you CAN fvck them. Marriage/Civil Unions isn't the issue I'm discussing right now. . .nice misdirection.
2)You "witnessed" gay culture. That's like a gay person going to mardi gras or spring break and saying they witnessed "straight" culture. Don't lecture me about playing the victim card when you've done so yourself...see bolded. You wouldn't take that crap from a liberal. Why should I take it from you?
3) Why are you doubting my sincerity when I am talking about following the law. . .Answer my questions: Why are you assuming I am condoning these behaviors? Are you pursuing this idea based on what I have actually said, or are you interpreting it through the lens of your own prejudices?
*TKay*
1. Of course equal treatment under the law isn't a foreign concept to me. You are using the law to fit your argument and to defend your sexuality from not being bizarre. It is. BTW, pedophiles aren't supposed to fvck children, but they still do....because it is
their sexual preference. There was no "misdirection" intended in bringing gay marriage into it. I would
think that if you are sincere in your statements and feelings on
sexaul preference differing from the norm, that you would
be a proponent of gay marriage. If you are not, oh well....that just tells me that you are satisfied "fvcking" anybody of any sexual orientation, but don't care to have a legally binding commitment to that person. That is your perogative. I can guarantee you ALL the hoomosexuals that I have known want nothing more than for gay marriage to be legal, because they are true to themselves and what they are. I also brought gay marriage up because it
is a controversial
legal issue among the gay community.
2. My witnessing gay culture is first-handed experience with homosexuals, period. You got all upset and accused me of not knowing and understanding what it is like to be bisexual or pansexual or whatever...of course I don't know what it is "like" to BE any of those things, just as a person with a deviating sexual preference doesn't knows what it is like to be straight
My point is that I have spent time with homosexuals, who are often shunned in society. I did not do that. If homosexuals were to shun straight people, they would live in a bubble. I wasn't nearly as closed-minded as you seem to think I am.
You've been the playing the victim ever since you've jumped into this thread by waxing indignant about none of us understanding what it is like to be you....all because some of us didn't even KNOW what a "pansexual" is. Your reaction to this in this thread IS like that of a liberal.
Sure, I was the victim of the lesbians in some situations...a situation that I put myself in, of which case I take full responsibility for. I can't BE the victim of that of which I willingly placed myself in, now can I?
3. Your sincerity is in check here because you say in one breath that you feel that all people deserve equal treatment, no matter their sexual preference...then say "so long as they are following the law" in another breath. Sexual deviance is sexual deviance. I can see why it is illegal for some, as others can be exploited, but sexual preference is also sexual preference. Your paremeters also conveniently cover just you, and they come off as a bit disingenuous to me...a bit inconsistent.
