Author Topic: AG to US: FU  (Read 1144 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Crazy Horse

  • Army 0 Navy 34
  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5571
  • Reputation: +236/-143
  • Sex, Booze and Bacon Minion
AG to US: FU
« on: February 08, 2008, 01:06:50 PM »
What is wrong with these people??

The "sarda sarda" primitive put the tin foil hat on tight today

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2835387

Quote
bonito (1000+ posts)       Fri Feb-08-08 01:34 PM
Original message
AG to US: FU
 Advertisements [?]Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 01:38 PM by bonito
In what can’t possibly be over-reported (but, alas, will be noticed by very few—it is not on the front page of the New York Times, for instance, and their short story about the hearing, buried deep inside, only mentions the AG’s face off with Congress over cocaine sentencing guidelines), Mukasey made several startling declarations:

# No, the Justice Department will not be investigating whether the now-admitted-to waterboarding of US prisoners was against the law.

# And, no, the DoJ will not be investigating whether the Bush Administration’s warrantless surveillance was illegal. Nor will the AG appoint a special prosecutor to investigate.

# And, no, the Department of Justice will not enforce any contempt citations that Congress might bring against administration officials that have failed to honor subpoenas for testimony. more http://www.theseminal.com/2008/02/08/ag-to-us-fu/

 
Quote
ayeshahaqqiqa  (1000+ posts)       Fri Feb-08-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can the Sergeant at Arms arrest him when he comes to Congress again?
 That mace looks rather heavy and intimidating.
 

You a damn idiot

Quote
ixion  (1000+ posts)       Fri Feb-08-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. thanks to Feinstein and other dems who voted to confirm this fascist
 bastard


 :lmao:

Quote
Herdin_Cats (59 posts)       Fri Feb-08-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. There has to be a better way of appointing an AG.
 The AG needs to be independent so that they are more loyal to the law than to the President or the party. Look at the partisan, loyal Bushies that Bush has appointed and the senate has approved. Yikes. There can be no justice with AGs like that.
 

Is this primitive franks sock  :rotf:
You got off your ass, now get your wife off her back.

Offline Bondai

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2256
  • Reputation: +158/-86
  • Rode hard and put up wet too many times.
Re: AG to US: FU
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2008, 01:14:28 PM »
Quote
Herdin_Cats (59 posts)       Fri Feb-08-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. There has to be a better way of appointing an AG.
 The AG needs to be independent so that they are more loyal to the law than to the President or the party. Look at the partisan, loyal Bushies that Bush has appointed and the senate has approved. Yikes. There can be no justice with AGs like that.

But all was right with the world when Clintoons AG was allowing the murder of 80 innocent people at WACO..


"It's mercy, compassion, and forgiveness I lack; not rationality".