I can't think of any moral values that can be derived from religious doctrine that have no consequences. If God told us not to do something, there was always a reason and a consequence.
Then in that sense, you should be able to see what I am saying. By the very nature of the fact that we experience negative and positive consequences (individually and collectively) we actually learn and know a universal morality, no scripture necessary. For example, murder isnt universally wrong because we all read the same scriptures... its wrong because it spreads misery, pain, and too much of those things makes society un-livable. Sexual ethics can also be derived this way, as well as ethics for individual liberty and freedom. It shouldn't be much of a stretch to think that generally there are good practical reasons, grounded in the natural world, for moral codes aside from the 'doing what God wants' factor. This is evidenced by the difficulty in positing examples of real moral behaviour that when followed... provide no practical utility what-so-ever.
Unless human nature changes to such a degree so that we love to experience consequences that we, at present, try to avoid, then these things will always be wrong. Seeing as how most of the things we try to avoid, or enshrine in our moral codes, are things that hinder or benefit our survival I don't think we really need to worry about that happening.
