Author Topic: Bombshell Report Reveals How Major Banks Discriminated Against Conservatives  (Read 386 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34925
  • Reputation: +3986/-248
Bombshell Report Reveals How Major Banks Discriminated Against Conservatives

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/10/14/bombshell-report-reveals-how-major-banks-discriminated-against-conservatives-n4958302

Quote
Nine of the country's biggest banks spent five years running an outrageous campaign to cut conservatives, Christians, pro-lifers, and Trump supporters out of the financial system, and the federal government now has the receipts.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) released its Debanking Review on Wednesday. Miranda Devine first broke the story in the New York Post. The 47-page report, titled "Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans," draws on a hundred thousand complaints and fifty thousand internal bank records from 2020 through 2025. It names JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank, Capital One, PNC, TD Bank, and BMO Bank.

Every one of them hid behind the same excuse: "reputation risk."

What did these banks fear? Bad press, protests, attacks from activist outfits like the Southern Poverty Law Center, and retaliation from regulators and politicians. So they purged anyone who might draw that heat. Christian organizations lost service over their views on abortion, LGBT issues, and traditional family values. Gun makers and retailers, Arctic oil and gas, coal, detention facilities, tobacco, and e-cigarette companies all saw financing dry up.

Hopefully lawsuits and extensive discovery processes will follow. :popcorn:
Whose Shampeachment Is It Anyway, where the high crimes are made up, and the evidence doesn't matter

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34925
  • Reputation: +3986/-248
The Debanking Scandal Started in Washington, Not Wall Street

https://townhall.com/columnists/ej-antoni/2026/10/17/the-debanking-scandal-started-in-washington-not-wall-street-n2684846

Quote
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has confirmed what conservatives have said for years. The OCC's 47-page report, released Wednesday after reviewing 100,000 complaints and 50,000 internal bank records, found that between 2020 and 2025 the nation’s nine largest national banks denied service to Americans because of their political, social, or religious beliefs.

The details are ugly. JPMorgan’s WePay payment unit closed the account of a merchant selling “MAGA” themed merchandise, and its screening system flagged phrases like “America First.” It shut down a religious non-profit because the Southern Poverty Law Center, since indicted on federal fraud charges, had branded it a hate group.

PNC refused a line of credit to a media company because one owner’s foundation had funded Christian conservative groups. Banks also choked off financing to entire lawful industries like firearms, coal, Arctic oil and gas, private prisons, tobacco, etc. While the instinct is to blame the banks, a different culprit emerges in the report’s details.

Banks feared negative press, protests, and organized activist criticism. But the greatest fear was reprisals from regulators and politicians, because those can actually shut down a financial institution.

A Wells Fargo review of a prospective firearms client was blunt: under the Biden administration, banks could face “greater supervisory pressure to move away from lending to the firearms industry.” Another bank dropped private-prison clients citing “changing policymaker attitudes,” then tried to win one back just months into the Trump administration.

Those aren’t the actions of institutions pursuing an ideological crusade but of businesses reading the weather in Washington. ...
...
Fortunately, the Trump administration has acted. Its August 2025 executive order directed regulators to end politicized debanking, and the OCC has stopped using reputational risk in examinations. But executive orders and agency guidance can be reversed on the first day of the next administration. Another far-left White House could revive reputational risk, restore the quiet phone calls, and start the cycle over.

Congress ought to step up and make that impossible by enshrining into law protections for bank customers and the banks themselves so that the latter cannot be unconstitutionally coerced by regulators. ...

Unless bureaucrats abusing their authority receive consequences, they will abuse again.
Whose Shampeachment Is It Anyway, where the high crimes are made up, and the evidence doesn't matter

Offline Ptarmigan

  • Bunny Slayer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24819
  • Reputation: +1102/-226
  • God Hates Bunnies
It is really chilling and troubling.
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-Napoleon Bonaparte

Allow enemies their space to hate; they will destroy themselves in the process.
-Lisa Du

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34925
  • Reputation: +3986/-248
Treasury traces SPLC to debanking of Christians after group dismissed it as conspiracy

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/investigations/4777156/treasury-traces-splc-debanking-christians-conspiracy-theory/

Quote
Federal finance authorities have identified the Southern Poverty Law Center’s “hate group” labels as the driving force behind the debanking of conservative individuals and organizations, particularly clients that were giving to Christian causes.

The explosive findings directly discredit a recent proclamation from the SPLC declaring, as part of its “Hatewatch” monitoring project, that anti-Christian debanking was a conspiracy theory spread by the “Christian supremacy movement.”

Though only a regulatory audit, fulfilling an executive order from President Donald Trump to ensure that banks were not discriminating against customers on the basis of their political or religious beliefs, the government’s findings add to the SPLC’s latest woes.
...
The 47-page report said the SPLC played a key role in the debanking of, as well as the denial of financial services to, conservative clients wanting to support Christian groups or individuals financially.

But just last year, the SPLC published a “Hatewatch” memo claiming that institutional debanking of the religious Right was an imaginary threat existing only in the minds of Christian supremacists called “dominionists,” those who believe that Christians are “called by God to exercise dominion over every aspect of society” by taking control of all institutions.

In particular, the SPLC alleged that the “anti-LGBTQ+ hate group” Alliance Defending Freedom, a mainstream Christian conservative legal firm known for taking up religious rights cases, was pushing these “conspiratorial claims of Christian victimhood.”
...
It turns out, however, that many of the banks highlighted in the Treasury report were regularly basing their decisions to debank certain disfavored customers on the SPLC’s classification of “hate groups” operating in America.
...
Treasury Department oversight officials say they discovered that PNC Bank declined to issue a line of credit to a media company in late 2021 due to “reputation[al] risk” concerns about its conservative owners.

The situation was brought before the bank’s environmental and social governance group, and employees at the bank allegedly noted that one owner’s foundation “has funded several Christian conservative groups, including several identified as hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center.”
...
According to the Treasury report, WePay was monitoring for violations of its terms of service using particular search terms and phrases, such as “MAGA,” “Make America Great,” and “America First,” to flag merchants who might be involved in “prohibited activities.”

I wish more debanked orgs were named in the article, but that the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) was one does not surprise me. The ADF has, among other people and groups, represented people/groups the SPLC hates, thus earning the "hate group" label. The ADF is actually worse, by SPLC standards, as it has won such cases ... all the way to the US Supreme Court.
Whose Shampeachment Is It Anyway, where the high crimes are made up, and the evidence doesn't matter

Offline ADsOutburst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6626
  • Reputation: +2045/-14
Treasury traces SPLC to debanking of Christians after group dismissed it as conspiracy

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/investigations/4777156/treasury-traces-splc-debanking-christians-conspiracy-theory/

I wish more debanked orgs were named in the article, but that the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) was one does not surprise me. The ADF has, among other people and groups, represented people/groups the SPLC hates, thus earning the "hate group" label. The ADF is actually worse, by SPLC standards, as it has won such cases ... all the way to the US Supreme Court.

Just as with voter fraud and riots, I suspect we may see some goalpost-moving on this issue. "It doesn't exist" will turn to "it's only 'hate groups'", then who knows?