I teach calculus at Berkeley. Some of my students can’t do middle school math

[SVPete]

I teach calculus at Berkeley. Some of my students can’t do middle school math

https://sfstandard.com/opinion/2026/08/15/uc-berkeley-sat-test-blind-admissions-math-scores/

In March, two California families opened college admissions decisions that should make anyone who cares about higher education stop and think.

One student — I’ll call him Elias — was admitted to a top University of California engineering program. His family was thrilled though surprised. Math had been his weakest subject in high school, but they assumed the university had seen something they hadn’t.

Another student — Nadia — watched rejection after rejection arrive from UC campuses. One turned her down even though she had earned A’s there in Calculus II and other college-level STEM courses through concurrent enrollment.

These are real students. I’ve changed their names, and withheld their schools, to protect their privacy.
Seen side by side, their outcomes don’t make sense. They make perfect sense only if you imagine admissions working less like careful evaluation and more like chance.
...
I teach mathematics at UC Berkeley. Three days a week, I stand in front of lecture halls with 500 to 1,400 students. By the second week of the semester, I already know who is in trouble. Some students are five to eight years behind in mathematics. Office hours that should be spent discussing integrals instead become lessons on fractions and basic algebra you would expect students to learn in middle school.

That is why this spring and summer, thousands of faculty members across all 10 UC campuses — including more than two-thirds of UC’s mathematics faculty — signed open letters(opens in new tab) urging the system to restore the SAT and ACT in admissions. Five Nobel laureates joined us, along with professors from across the university, including Beatriz Manz, Berkeley’s first Latina full professor.

1. Invisible to much of the world, because engineering students tend not to make "news-worthy" noise, UC Berkeley has long had a top-level college of engineering. The scheme of random, non-pre-tested, students means either fewer students go into engineering, or more students try and fail. Either way the number and possibly "quality" of engineering grads has declined.

2. Note how carefully this author treads. She (the byline family name is in Slavic feminine form) did not mention that the oft-rejected "Nadia" is probably Asian or white. In her paragraph about the professors' "open letter", she made a point of mentioning that a signee is female and Hispanic, a probably unsuccessful attempt to preclude denunciation of the letters as racist. Without calling it out directly, she is hinting, not weakly, but not quite strongly, that UC is still discriminating against Asians and whites, with unsurprising consequences in the student population's aggregate preparedness and eventual outcomes (does it do an unprepared person of a favored ethnicity any favor by admitting them to a university for which they are unprepared and from which they are likely to drop out?!).