Author Topic: There’s More Proof of Election Fraud Than Global Warming, Israeli Genocide, and  (Read 70 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20250
  • Reputation: +2818/-49
There’s More Proof of Election Fraud Than Global Warming, Israeli Genocide, and Socialism Working

For about a decade, I did PR consulting work for one of the leading fintech companies. I wrote and disseminated dozens of press releases touting its fraud stats. These stats were impressive, too — impressive enough to generate widespread media coverage (which was kinda-sorta the point).

It was all made up.

Not in a malicious way. To my knowledge, nothing was illegal or unethical. But the God’s honest truth is, nobody knows the true rate of fraud, because you can’t always quantify successful crimes. (Especially cybercrimes, which include theft, hacking, credit card misuse, and data breaches.)

So, we guestimate.

Almost all fraud stats are works of fiction — or more accurately, works of art: We’re painting a picture “inspired” by the data — plus certain (self-serving) assumptions, guesses, extrapolations, and biases.

If you’re gonna accuse me of cherry-picking data points and “artistically” creating statistics that benefited my client, well, you’re exactly right!

Everyone has biases. If you’re a fintech company, you’re incentivized to instill urgency for your services. It’s usually a straightforward calculation: The bigger you claim your fraud category is, the more valuable your fintech services are.

“Follow the money.”

But at least I’m being upfront about my bias. The mainstream media, however, is not.

The network TV giants, the New York Times, CNN, and others are still claiming to be fair, impartial, and right down the middle. We see this conceit in the New York Times’ original mission statement from 1896: “To give the news impartially, without fear or favor, regardless of any party, sect, or interest involved.”

Which is why it’s so awfully revealing to examine which stats the media elites accept at face value — and which stats they refuse to accept at all.

Take, for instance, President Donald Trump’s speech last night on voter fraud:

New York Times: Trump Exaggerates Claims About Election Vulnerabilities in Speech

The New Republic: Declassified Docs Expose Trump’s Made-Up Election Fraud Claims

USA Today: Trump’s Chinese Election Meddling Claims Face Skepticism

The Hill: Democrats Call ‘Bulls---’ on Trump’s Election Interference Claims

Washington Post: Trump’s Speech Stops Short of Offering Evidence of Vote Tampering

New York Times: Multiple Investigations Refuted Trump’s Claim That Fraud Altered the Outcome in 2020

Salt Lake Tribune: Trump Makes Outlandish Claims About Election Results in Address

Los Angeles Times: Trump Repeats Debunked Claims About Voting Vulnerabilities in Prime-Time Speech

Irish Star: CNN Host Brands Donald Trump ‘Delusional’ As He ‘Spews a Bunch of Lies’ in Election Rant

CBS News: In Primetime Speech, Trump Revisits Disputed Claims About Election Security and Declassifies Documents

New York Times: Warnock and Ossoff, Georgia’s Senators, Ridicule Trump’s Election Fraud Claims

The Atlantic: Trump Just Did More Damage to American Elections Than China

The Free Press: The President Who Cried ‘Election Fraud’

The Hill: Senate Democrat Calls for Trump Impeachment After Election Claims

USA Today: Trump Overstates Election Weakness in Primetime Speech: 5 Takeaways

New York Times: Trump’s Obsession With Relitigating the 2020 Election Carries a Cost for Democracy

The mainstream media messaging was undeniable: Trump is exaggerating how bad the problem is! We demand more truth! We demand more evidence! Why, these unsubstantiated, unproven claims are doing more harm than good!

Fine. If media outlets want to demand strict scrutiny of sociopolitical claims, that’s entirely their prerogative.

In fact, good for them. We could use more skepticism in the media.

But why does the mainstream media have the EXACT OPPOSITE standard when it comes to covering global warming, allegations of Israel committing genocide, and the theory that socialism leads to prosperity?

More at link:

https://pjmedia.com/scott-pinsker/2026/07/17/theres-more-proof-of-election-fraud-than-global-warming-israeli-genocide-and-socialism-working-n4955159

I really like this comparison because it is so spot on.
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender


Offline DefiantSix

  • Captain, IKV Defiant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19210
  • Reputation: +2096/-189
  • Set Condition One throughout the ship.
There’s More Proof of Election Fraud Than Global Warming, Israeli Genocide, and Socialism Working...



COMBINED  :whatever:
"Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here."
-- Capt. John Parker

"I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission"
-- Capt. Steve Rogers

"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem."
-- Ronaldus Magnus


There's a reason National Command Authority doesn't give me the nuclear 'Football' for safekeeping, and it's NOT because I'm not in the chain of command.

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20250
  • Reputation: +2818/-49
This is interesting, as I shared it on Gutfeld's forum a couple of hours ago and now there is an update:

EXCLUSIVE: The Secret Reason Why Fox News Is So Silent About Trump’s Election Fraud Speech [UPDATED]
09:58 AM on July 18, 2026

This is a major new story, because the PR implications are enormous: America’s #1 conservative media outlet is AWOL in the election fraud debate.

Which means, if Republicans are going to win the PR argument, we must do it without Fox News as a counterbalance to the mainstream media.

After President Donald Trump’s primetime address on voter fraud on Thursday evening, the media noticed something curious: Fox News Channel was ignoring the story.

Mediaite: Fox & Friends Completely Ignores Trump’s Election Speech — Doesn’t Mention It Once in 3-Hour Show

Quote
As other networks picked apart President Donald Trump’s prime-time address to the nation early Friday morning, Fox News went in a completely different direction.

Fox & Friends produced not one mention of the president’s address from the night before, during which the commander in chief once again attempted to cast doubt on the integrity of American elections — pointing a finger at Venezuela and China.

Instead, the regular lineup of co-hosts Brian Kilmeade, Ainsley Earhardt, and Lawrence Jones discussed the latest campaign of U.S. airstrikes against Iran, the air quality crisis choking much of America, disastrous flooding in Texas, the World Cup, and a “phenomenal” speech — by Marco Rubio.

Near the end of the three-hour show, the F&F crew turned it over to America’s Newsroom host Dana Perino for a preview of the 9 a.m. show. In it, she also did not mention the speech.

Mediaite wasn’t the only outlet that noticed this omission. Over on CNN, Brian Stelter told viewers, “And here’s maybe the best tell of all: Fox News did not spend much time on this after the speech. They moved on right away. Fox News barely talking about this speech this morning. That tells me some of Trump’s allies in MAGA media know this might not be a winning issue for him.” [emphasis added]

Actually, it tells me Brian Stelter — CNN’s “chief media analyst” — knows a helluva lot less than I do about how the news media actually functions.

Here’s the CNN clip:

~~~ Clip of Tater Stelter if one is inclined ~~~

Other left-leaning outlets adopted similar talking points.

The New Republic: Trump’s Favorite News Show Totally Ignores His Election Fraud Speech

President Trump’s rant to the nation about election fraud Thursday night was full of inaccuracies, previously known information, and claims unsupported by evidence. On the biggest conservative TV network, Fox News, which Trump watches regularly, no one is giving it much attention Friday morning.

[…]

Laura Ingraham didn’t even discuss the speech, even though Trump was scheduled to speak just two hours later. Jesse Watters gave it a passing mention at the end of his show, prioritizing one of his correspondents interviewing people in bathing suits at Central Park. Sean Hannity gave the speech a small amount of discussion and said his show would look into it in the coming days.

The Nation’s sub-header told its readers, “Not even Fox News buys Trump’s new lies, but they will be used to undermine the midterms.”

Quote
Surprisingly, there are some lies so outrageous that even Sean Hannity is reluctant to endorse them.

[…]

In fact, [Trump’s] speech was so disgracefully packed with lies that even some of the president’s most loyal lapdogs decided to keep their distance from it.

[…]

The lukewarm response from flunkies like [Hannity] is telling. They were right to want nothing to do with the speech.

The left-wing media is pushing this interpretation because it directly undermines President Trump’s argument and credibility: “Not even Trump’s ‘flunkies’ at Fox News believe this nonsense! The president is lying again!”

It was a clever way to score political points.

But the truth, alas, is even darker and more disturbing.

About two years ago, I pitched a cybersecurity expert to a prominent Fox News producer. S/he is someone I’ve worked with since Barack Obama’s first term. (For obvious reasons, I don’t want to reveal his/her name, but he/she produces one of FNC’s most high-profile Monday through Friday TV shows.)

The topic I pitched was cyber vulnerabilities in U.S. voting machines.

The producer sent me a one-sentence reply: “I like it - but We don’t touch election fraud in any capacity.”

Nothing else needed to be said. Unless you’re a total moron (or CNN’s “chief media analyst”), you could read between the lines: One of the longterm consequences of Fox News settling its lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems for $787.5 million is that FNC programming will avoid discussing voter fraud.

The topic appears to be forbidden. Fox News shuns it like the plague. (Or like Taco Bell’s lettuce.)

Which means, FNC’s silence on Trump’s voter fraud claims isn’t an editorial decision; nor does it mean that the president’s speech was “so disgracefully packed with lies that even some of the president’s most loyal lapdogs decided to keep their distance from it.”

And it absolutely, positively, 100% doesn’t mean what Brian Stelter told CNN’s viewers was the “best tell of all” — that “some of Trump’s allies in MAGA media know this might not be a winning issue for him.”

It means FNC’s silence was a legal/business decision from ownership.

Quote
Fox News agreed Tuesday to pay Dominion Voting Systems nearly $800 million to avert a trial in the voting machine company’s lawsuit that would have exposed how the network promoted lies about the 2020 presidential election.

The stunning settlement emerged just as opening statements were supposed to begin, abruptly ending a case that had embarrassed Fox News over several months and raised the possibility that network founder Rupert Murdoch and stars such as Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity would have to testify publicly.

[…]

Outside of the $787.5 million promised to Colorado-based Dominion, it was unclear what other consequences Fox would face. Fox acknowledged in a statement “the court’s rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false,” but no apology was offered. [emphasis added]

If FNC doesn’t have a free hand to fight back, Republicans have lost an important PR asset. Unfortunately, this seems to be the case: For legal and business reasons, Fox News cannot rally public opinion on this issue; apparently, it’s been censored and defanged.

Which means we’ll have to win the election fraud argument without FNC’s help.

And it means CNN’s “chief media analyst” is either stunningly — and embarrassingly — ignorant of the media, or he’s lying to viewers for political reasons.

One Last Thing: 2026 will reach a crescendo with the midterm elections. Nothing less than the fate of the America First movement teeters in the balance.

Never before have the political battle lines been so clearly defined. Win or lose, 2026 will transform our country.

AND THE UPDATE THIS AFTERNOON, FOX FINALLY COVERED IT:

UPDATE: Fox has just published a major story on Trump's speech and his revelations about election meddling:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/read-documents-white-house-releases-election-integrity-files-after-trump-speech

Original story:

https://pjmedia.com/scott-pinsker/2026/07/18/exclusive-the-secret-reason-why-fox-news-is-staying-so-silent-about-trumps-election-fraud-speech-n4955185

 :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:

Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender