Author Topic: Do I understand this correctly?  (Read 48 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6924
  • Reputation: +2062/-30
Do I understand this correctly?
« on: Today at 09:50:15 AM »
Quote
Johonny (26,566) Posts

Do I understand this correctly?

JD Vance is threatening to withhold 1.3 billion in Medicaide payments to California because he believes, no proof offered, the state doesn't do enough to eliminate fraud, which he's offered no proof of. This is money Californians have paid in their taxes to receive a service that is essential to their staying the **** alive and healthy.

This is also the same administration that is giving 10 billion dollars of our tax money to Trump in one of the biggest examples of federal fraud ever witnessed. If Vance is the fraud czar, WTF isn't he watching that shit? Because he is in on it, obviously.

**** these people. That's our money.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100221238975

No proof?? 🙄

Online DefiantSix

  • Captain, IKV Defiant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19140
  • Reputation: +2088/-189
  • Set Condition One throughout the ship.
Re: Do I understand this correctly?
« Reply #1 on: Today at 10:15:19 AM »
Quote
Johonny (26,566) Posts

Do I understand this correctly?
[/snip]

As usual, DUmp'Rat; no, no you don't understand correctly, partially, or so much as in the slightest.  :thatsright:

  • Vice President Vance is no longer THREATENING to withhold the funds to 800 fraudulent "home health" and "hospice" care organizations in Commiefornia. He has done so, PAST TENSE.
  • Of those 800 organizations identified as fraudulent and suspended from receiving payments from the Treasury trough, only 10% (about 80 organizations, for those of you DUmp'Rats from Rio Linda) have availed themselves of the EXISTING appeals process to attempt to reverse that determination, thereby identifying either the more legitimate organizations, or the more brazen of the fraudsters. Some of those 80 organizations may get their funding restored, but almost certainly not all of them, and definitely not a significant portion of $130 million that represents a 10% portion of the TAXPAYER MONEY that was prevented from being defrauded by those organizations.

Hope this helps, DUmp'Rat (though I'm not expecting miracles)...  :whatever:
« Last Edit: Today at 10:17:42 AM by DefiantSix »
"Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here."
-- Capt. John Parker

"I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission"
-- Capt. Steve Rogers

"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem."
-- Ronaldus Magnus


There's a reason National Command Authority doesn't give me the nuclear 'Football' for safekeeping, and it's NOT because I'm not in the chain of command.

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33289
  • Reputation: +3773/-248
Re: Do I understand this correctly?
« Reply #2 on: Today at 11:03:00 AM »
...
  • Vice President Vance is no longer THREATENING to withhold the funds to 800 fraudulent "home health" and "hospice" care organizations in Commiefornia. He has done so, PAST TENSE.
  • Of those 800 organizations identified as fraudulent and suspended from receiving payments from the Treasury trough, only 10% (about 80 organizations, for those of you DUmp'Rats from Rio Linda) have availed themselves of the EXISTING appeals process to attempt to reverse that determination, thereby identifying either the more legitimate organizations, or the more brazen of the fraudsters. Some of those 80 organizations may get their funding restored, but almost certainly not all of them, and definitely not a significant portion of $130 million that represents a 10% portion of the TAXPAYER MONEY that was prevented from being defrauded by those organizations.

Hope this helps, DUmp'Rat (though I'm not expecting miracles)...  :whatever:

 :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:  :hi5:

Well stated.

Adding a bit more detail, Medicaid (correct spelling) is Federally funded, but state administered (in California, "Medical").

* California bureaucrats failed to notice that in SoCal, dozens of supposed hospice organizations applied for and were recognized at single street addresses. Even a hospice without its own facility requires several thousand square feet for its nurses, aides, and administrative people. The bureaucrats failed to notice - or knowingly ignored - grossly obvious evidence of fraud.

* Further, California bureaucrats failed to notice that 10s of millions of dollars were being billed from single street addresses, more grossly obvious evidence of fraud. Whether gross negligence or accommodation, fraud is fraud, and Vance cur off the $$ feeding the fraud.

On the side, there's an interesting contrast in this. The jobs given the VP by the USC are not extensive. LIEden gave Kammie a job that could have been a huge boost, "Border Czar", toward the Presidency. Kammie did more or less nothing. Trump gave Vance a similarly significant and highly visible job and ... Vance has Proggies howling, because he's doing that job.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

US Life Expectancy chart illustrating this, https://www.macrotrends.net/datasets/global-metrics/countries/usa/united-states/life-expectancy

Offline ADsOutburst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6092
  • Reputation: +1899/-14
Re: Do I understand this correctly?
« Reply #3 on: Today at 11:14:35 AM »
As a rule, if DU has to ask “Do I understand this correctly?”, the answer is usually “no”.

Offline CollectivismMustDie

  • American
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4416
  • Reputation: +1807/-42
  • (D)Ummie nightmare.
Re: Do I understand this correctly?
« Reply #4 on: Today at 11:19:26 AM »
As a rule, if DU has to ask “Do I understand this correctly?”, the answer is usually “no”.

You could fill several million learing centers with the things DUmmies do not understand correctly.

 :-)
"Be not intimidated... nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of your liberties by any pretense of politeness, delicacy, or decency. These, as they are often used, are but three different names for hypocrisy, chicanery and cowardice." - John Adams

Hillary Clinton will never be the President of the United States.