Author Topic: Is a new stereotype being born?  (Read 832 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6861
  • Reputation: +2028/-30
Is a new stereotype being born?
« on: April 17, 2026, 10:25:40 AM »
Quote
LAS14 (15,522 posts)

Is a new stereotype being born?

About a month ago, as we were watching one of Swalwell's frequent appearances on MS.NOW, I said, completely joking, "Nah, ever since John Edwards, I've been suspicious of handsome politicians. It never crossed my mind that, indeed, it had happened again.

So I'm wondering if handsome politicians are going to begin suffering the fate of good looking blond women.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100221180297

Now that right there is extra extra stupid

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33002
  • Reputation: +3734/-248
Re: Is a new stereotype being born?
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2026, 10:48:40 AM »
While in high school I noticed that many beautiful girls were also unpleasant stuck-ups or just b@#$hes, I never built those few observations into stereotypes.

Among pols, I don't know. The Three Kennedys were horndogs. Edwards ... Swillwell ... but if DU-member LAS14 is so smart, why didn't (s)he advise DU-folk to take Swillwell with a block of salt?
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

US Life Expectancy chart illustrating this, https://www.macrotrends.net/datasets/global-metrics/countries/usa/united-states/life-expectancy

Offline ADsOutburst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5996
  • Reputation: +1868/-14
Re: Is a new stereotype being born?
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2026, 11:20:01 AM »
I din’t think that’s really a new stereotype.

Offline RonE

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 510
  • Reputation: +244/-1
Re: Is a new stereotype being born?
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2026, 11:32:22 PM »
Quote
While in high school I noticed that many beautiful girls were also unpleasant stuck-ups or just b@#$hes, I never built those few observations into stereotypes.

My guess is, the Libs are better at condemning or defending the individuals in question by creating  groups with loosely similar traits. The more people in these mailable and convenient groups, the more vagueness the can apply, and less specific are their arguments. This is important when they don't really grasp the situation in question
Add some inner-circle encouragement (and mix in a little THC) and it becomes their definition of a medical fact that's questioned only by knuckle draggers lacking the sophisticated comprehension only found on the left. No need to entertain our concerns.
I think that thought process is somewhat useful when they running from public debate while retaining aloofness