WaPo: On Second Thought, Our Reporter in Iran Is a Regime Hackhttps://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2026/03/30/wapo-on-second-thought-our-reporters-in-iran-are-regime-hacks-n3813384On Friday, the Washington Post accused the US military of a potential war crime. Its reporters in Iran took photos of what were purported to be anti-tank land mines supposedly tossed into residential areas, including in Shiraz, supposedly to deter the movement of mobile missile launchers (via Twitchy):
...
The Post claimed that the report came from an "independent" Canadian journalist, after quoting Iran's propagandists about the effect of the mines:
In a Telegram post Thursday, the Iranian State News Agency said at least one person had been killed and others injured as a result of the “explosive packages that resemble cans,” and it warned people to stay away from “any misshapen, deformed, or unusual metal cans.”
Central Command, which oversees U.S. operations in the region, declined to comment.
Images of the land mines were posted on social media platforms by Dimitri Lascaris, a Canadian independent journalist currently reporting from Iran and host of the “Reason2Resist” podcast, and state media outlet Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting.
Ahem. For most rational people, all of that would raise a number of red flags on reliability. Just the fact that the IRGC had promoted this narrative is reason enough for skepticism, given its propensity for making absurd AI-based imagery and video to substantiate outlandish claims of Iranian victories or American setbacks. Also, a single glance at Lascaris' Substack should have disabused anyone of the notion that Lascaris is "independent" at all in the editorial sense, with headlines such as:
Another Israeli War Crime In Iran
To 'Protect' Iranians From Iran's Police, U.S. and Israel Massacre Civilians
They're 'Liberating' Iranians By Murdering Them
Who Engages In More Censorship: Israel or Iran?
I'm Off To Iran To Cover The Crimes Of The Epstein Regime
...
Sometime over the weekend, the Post's editors must have gotten enough feedback to rethink this report ... a little. Rather than retract it, or rewrite it to discuss Lascaris' obvious hostility toward the US and Israel, the editors appended a "correction" at the end. In very small and greyish type, too:
A previous version of this article incorrectly described Dimitri Lascaris, a Canadian independent journalist, as being in Iran with permission from the Iranian government and said that the people accompanying him were government representatives. He said he was invited by the state media outlet Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting and that their employees acted as guides and interpreters.
I guess an invited and docented shill is present in Iran with permission, but the WashPost obviously under-stated what Lascaris is, knowingly. The WashPost let the lie they published circulate long enough to be "official" narrative and then published their very belated "Ooooopsie".