Parents Win, California Loses Over Secretive Transing of Kids: Court Rulinghttps://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2025/12/23/parents-win-california-loses-over-secretive-trans-ing-of-kids-court-ruling-n4947432California’s outrageous law hiding “gender transitions” of kids from parents just took a massive hit in a district court ruling.
The California law mandating that teachers hide gender transitions from parents if the parents do not support radical LGBTQ ideology is unconstitutional, as a new U.S. District Court ruling from Judge Roger Benitez found.
Legal expert Jonathan Turley noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly cited inherent parental rights, and that Benitez relied on one such ruling in issuing his own decision. Turley also highlighted the dangerous opinion found among many public school administrators and educators now, not to mention Democrat politicians, as Iowa school board member Rachel Wall expressed: “The purpose of a public ed is to not teach kids what the parents want. It is to teach them what society needs them to know. The client is not the parent, but the community.” And by community, they mean, of course, their own radical political community.
FWIW, Judge Roger Benitez is a GWB appointee. The parent plaintiffs were represented by the Thomas More Society.
Of course, AG Rob Bonta is almost certain to appeal this decision. While the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has earned a reputation for being very liberal, Trump has several appointees on the appeals court, and USSC rulings recognizing parents' rights in their children's education include the 1972 Wisconsin vs. Yoder and 1925 Pierce v. Society of Sisters. There is a significant possibility Bonta could lose in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and have to decide whether to appeal to a probably unsympathetic USSC. If Bonta appeals to and loses at the USSC, this ruling would by definition apply in every US state and territory.