Yesterday, I saw an article well Swalwell, the spy shagging farter, said that the litmus test for the dems' 2028 presidential candidate would be that the individual had to pledge to destroy Trump's ballroom on day one. Even though Trump is paying for the construction of the ballroom out of his own pocket and with funds from donors (instead of taxpayer money), you know that any destruction that the dems do will be fully from taxpayer money.
Apparently, the spy shagging farter is so confident that the dem voters are brainless slaves to the party (like the members of DU) that they won't mind their money being used to tear something down that didn't cost them anything. Maybe he's subtly telling them that he knows that they are too stupid to figure that out. Or maybe the spy shagging farter is too stupid to realize what he's saying?
They way I look at things (and maybe I'm wrong) is that Trump's ballroom will possibly save us money in the long run. From what I understand, in the past, since no ballroom was available, a huge tent was setup for such events. Surely, that had a cost that this ballroom will prevent.
