Wrong date, buddy.

Anyway, no link because it arrived via e-mail by the Washington Compost (paywall protected). Sometimes the headlines from such lib sites literally make me laugh out loud, and this one certainly did:
Eating meat is worse for the planet in some cities than in others. Look up your city.Researchers have documented for years that eating beef, pork and chicken has a significant environmental impact, especially when it comes to heating the planet.
But it’s far from a uniform impact. What you eat, and where you eat it, can have a big effect on how much you’re contributing to climate change, according to a study published Monday in the journal Nature Climate Change.
For the first time, researchers calculated the planet-warming pollution emitted from raising the beef, pork and chicken Americans eat — their carbon “hoofprint” — for every town and city in the country.
Across the country, eating beef is the bigger contributor to harmful pollutants. But it’s not as simple as that. Its origins matter. Eating a steak or a burger in Milwaukee, where the meat comes from nearby dairy cows, generates fewer emissions than in Oklahoma City, where beef tends to come from feedlots.
