Trump's Tariff Empire Crumbles in Court

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220534946

douglas9 (4,956 posts)
Mon Aug 4, 2025, 06:17 AM
3
Recommend
Trump's Tariff Empire Crumbles in Court -- And the Economic Fallout Could Be Massive
Thursday's federal appeals court hearing wasn't just another legal proceeding—it was a constitutional reckoning that could reshape American trade policy and trigger an economic earthquake.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit spent nearly two hours grilling Trump administration lawyers over the president's use of emergency powers to impose sweeping tariffs. The judges' skepticism was palpable, with one noting that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) "doesn't mention tariffs anywhere" and questioning whether Trump's interpretation would grant presidents "unbounded authority."

The Constitutional Crisis
Trump's legal team faced a brutal cross-examination. When Justice Department attorney Brett Shumate argued that trade deficits constituted an emergency justifying tariffs, judges pushed back hard. One judge warned that accepting Trump's logic could be "the death knell of the Constitution."

The core issue: Trump used IEEPA—a 1977 law designed for financial sanctions—to impose tariffs for the first time in U.S. history. As attorney Neal Katyal argued for the plaintiffs, this represents "a breathtaking claim to power that no president has asserted in 200 years."

What's at Stake

The Court of International Trade already ruled most of Trump's tariffs illegal in May, issuing a permanent injunction. That decision was paused pending this appeal, but if upheld, the economic consequences would be staggering.

The Refund Nightmare

Here's where it gets interesting—and potentially catastrophic for the economy. If the courts declare these tariffs illegal, importers who've paid billions in duties could demand refunds with interest. This creates a perfect storm:

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/8/2/2336516/-Trump-s-Tariff-Empire-Crumbles-in-Court-And-the-Economic-Fallout-Could-Be-Massive?pm_campaign=trending&pm_source=sidebar&pm_medium=web

malaise (287,384 posts)
1. He will lose
Reply to douglas9 (Original post)
Mon Aug 4, 2025, 06:33 AM
Take that to the bank

K & R for visibility

If you say so, I feel better already.

[67 Rover]

malaise (287,384 posts)
1. He will lose
Reply to douglas9 (Original post)
Mon Aug 4, 2025, 06:33 AM
Take that to the bank

K & R for visibility

The Jim Cramer of DUmmie underground speaks.

[SVPete]

1. US Supreme Court may rule otherwise.

2. This decision was preceded by a large number of the negotiated trade agreements that were the purpose of Trump's tariffs, so even this temporary court victory against US interests was bypassed by reality.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

2. This decision was preceded by a large number of the negotiated trade agreements that were the purpose of Trump's tariffs, so even this temporary court victory against US interests was bypassed by reality.

One would think that if Trump's position was as weak as it is being portrayed, all of the countries striking trade deals would have held off until the cases had resolved in their favor.