Author Topic: Is it fair to associate "Johns" as "human/sex traffickers"?  (Read 191 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3216
  • Reputation: +161/-25
Is it fair to associate "Johns" as "human/sex traffickers"?
« on: February 25, 2019, 07:33:08 AM »
Quote
Progressive Law (149 posts)


Is it fair to associate "Johns" as "human/sex traffickers"?

 
For example, society doesn't associate illegal drug users with drug trafficking.

I'm just looking for opinions, not trying to undermine the issue of human trafficking.

https://upload.democraticunderground.com/100211856552


Ask some of your fellow Dump Monkeys. Some are sex offenders.

Offline docstew

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4724
  • Reputation: +281/-187
  • My Wife is awesome!
Re: Is it fair to associate "Johns" as "human/sex traffickers"?
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2019, 07:47:18 AM »
They are participating in the trafficking of human beings, so, yes.

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15725
  • Reputation: +928/-172
Re: Is it fair to associate "Johns" as "human/sex traffickers"?
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2019, 08:25:37 AM »
Quote
Progressive Law (149 posts)

Is it fair to associate "Johns" as "human/sex traffickers"?

1. LPC Noob seems to have trouble with the English language.

2. Traffickers are like pimps who forcibly brought their "wares" from other locales (cities, states, or countries). "Johns" are the "customers" who may or may not know how the women they are ____ing got where they are.
Facts don't matter to DUpipo

Note to "Warpy": I voted for Donald Trump! I would do so again!

Big CHEETO is WATCHING You!

Offline FlaGator

  • Another Pilgrim
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4119
  • Reputation: +378/-29
  • Stand firm in the faith; be men of courage
Re: Is it fair to associate "Johns" as "human/sex traffickers"?
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2019, 09:02:39 AM »
Drug users are considered as drug traffickers as they are part of the chain.
Man’s greatness is so obvious that it can even be deduced from his wretchedness, for what is nature in animals we call wretchedness in man, thus recognizing that, if his nature is today like that of the animals, he must have fallen from some better state which was once his own.
Blaise Pascal

Offline Delmar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Reputation: +326/-39
Re: Is it fair to associate "Johns" as "human/sex traffickers"?
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2019, 02:23:21 PM »
Quote
Response to Blue_true (Reply #165)Sun Feb 24, 2019, 09:32 PM
Star Member EffieBlack (13,248 posts)
175. The vast majority of John's fall into the first two categories - and a couple categories

you left out. I'm not willing to give a pass to the first two kinds or the others - or ignore the humanity and suffering of the women and involved whom you didn't mention - in order to protect the men who want to pay hundreds and thousands of dollars for "consensual" sex.

And, FYI, my experience working with trafficked women taught me that men who pay big money for a prostitute aren't paying for sex - since men with means rarely have any trouble finding wonen to have sex with them for free. They are paying for temporary ownership of a woman whose agency they have taken away and whom they can subjugate and control (even if they're not engaging in physical violence).

Effie Black is all over this thread--at least a couple dozen posts.  She's not in demand as democrat underground's official blacksplainer anymore since the media swept the Ralph "Coonman" Northam blackface scandal under the rug, but it looks like she landed on her feet as an authority on prostitution.
"VA is an inclusive and diverse community—we won't put up with Ed Gillespie's racist rhetoric and fearmongering."
Democrat Virginia Gov. Ralph "Coonman" Northam 10/11/2017