I liked this little exchange:
madaboutharry (29,281 posts)
4. They didn't say that.
They said as described it is not accurate. That is not the same as saying the story is false. It could be that something is off.
There is nuance going on here.
oberliner (57,739 posts)
7. "Not accurate" is not the same as "false"?
Seriously?
madaboutharry (29,281 posts)
9. In the world of lawyers it is not the same.
Dummie completely ignores the fact that Mueller the Silent actually came out and made a statement denying the story. I'm guessing he did not want the US House to start impeachment proceedings on a complete fabrication. It also tells me that there is nothing there on President Trump.
Continuing on:
LanternWaste (31,985 posts)
11. Don't know much about legal terminology, eh?
It's cool... can be almost as difficult as special elections.
oberliner (57,739 posts)
16. I will do my best to respond to this in 24 business hours
Dummie oberliner just slapped the shit out of laternwaste and he/she/it don't even know it.
Then there are these little jewels:
gldstwmn (166 posts)
14. Amen. We got ****ed on Fitzmas by this guy.
Trump is guilty AF. We didn't need this guy to interfere. Why in God's name did the MSM pick this up given his track record? Ugh.
Because the MSM are as batshit nuts as you dummies are?
grumpyduck (663 posts)
13. I'm surprised Mueller's office said anything at all. n/t
I am too. It tells me the story has no basis in fact and Mueller felt the record needed to be set straight.