From I_B_P's article:
VERTISEMENT
The Texas lawmaker, who represents a district that covers part of Houston, read aloud his articles on the House floor and stressed that Trump should not have to be convicted of a crime in order to be impeached.
In his articles of impeachment, Green cited Trump's equivocating response to the violence at a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Va.; attacks on NFL players kneeling during the national anthem to protest police brutality; and since-debunked accusations that former President Obama ordered a wiretap of Trump Tower as examples of how Trump has "undermined the integrity of his office" and "brought disrepute on the presidency."
Another article of impeachment states that Trump engaged in “perfidy” by making the false claim that millions of people voted illegally in the 2016 presidential election.
I see Rep. Green hasn't read the part in the USC about "high
crimes and
misdemeanors". His bases for impeachment amount to nothing more than, "Trump said stuff I disagree with."
I see that when the Rs tried to bring the resolution to the floor right away, Rep. Green made like an ax and split.
Will a daily cat-and-mouse game ensue?