Author Topic: Eugenics and Abortion  (Read 2570 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sneakypete

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
  • Reputation: +13/-4
Eugenics and Abortion
« on: June 27, 2017, 06:26:05 AM »
I see and have seen passionate as well as sometimes intelligent discussions about these issues for years,but NEVER see any pros to oppose the cons.

So I am going to state some in order to start a discussion where the OTHER side of the arguments is also stated.

We all know the anti-eugenics and anti-abortion points,and they ALL seem to be based entirely on emotions and religious beliefs. I am NOT claiming those are bad reasons,just trying to state what *I* think are the basic facts.

The Eugenics people base their intellectual (mostly unspoken) argument on some pretty solid facts,namely that there is a finite amount of resources available on the planet,and the sick,the lame,the stupid,and the lazy use up more than their fair share and contribute nothing in return in a modern world where grunt labor has very little value to societies,and has less value with each passing year.

In addition there are birth rates to consider,and no one can argue that the most productive and educated societies produce fewer babies than the ignorant and backwards societies,therefore creating a situation where unless things change radically there will be a tiny minority of the world population that will essentially be working and denying themselves the joys of larger families and more productive nations in order to provide food,shelter,clothing,medical care,comfort,and entertainment for a massive population of people who are little more advanced than cave men,and who have no interest in advancing any further or even taking care of themselves because the advanced and industrious people's and nations will take care of them.

The planet Earth is a closed system and there can be no question about there being a finite amount of resources available,regardless of how many people need or demand those resources for themselves. The abortion and eugenics people don't seem to want to say this out loud,but you don't have to have a Doctorate in Sociology to understand that at some point the needy will outnumber the providers by a massive percentage of the world's population because they are breeding like rabbits while the providers are limiting their family sizes in order to provide more comfort and stability.

IF you accept this projection as an indisputable truth,and given human nature it sure seems to be an indisputable truth,we will eventually arrive at a point where the necessities of life as well as the luxuries are running out,and the mobs will revolt and demand ALL the necessities as well as the luxuries be given to them instead of kept for themselves by the people responsible for creating and producing them,and that is when the violent revolution will happen that will virtually take the planet back to the Stone Age as the humans that are little more than animals murder off the productive people in order to get the luxuries they want.

I am not real sure how well I have stated the POV of the Eugenics and Abortion people because they never seem to be interested in discussing the WHY's of their POV. They just state what they think needs to be done,and even then they don't go into details. Mostly because they CAN'T without appearing to be cold and selfish,and having their opponents scream "NAZI!" at them and demand they be killed or put into prison for suggesting people need to be responsible.  I am basing what I wrote on what SEEMS TO ME to be the basis of their logic and efforts.

If you are an Eugenics and Abortion supporter and think I have misstated your positions,PLEASE speak up and correct me.

We all know the basis of the anti-Eugenics and Anti-Abortion crowds are religious beliefs,and organized religions NEED  huge masses of followers for political power as well as a base to build their wealth on.

I see no possible basis for a middle-ground where the two opposing groups can meet and agree on any sort of compromise at all. One side wants to limit population so there are more resources and power for fewer people,and the other side wants to increase population because that is where their power base lies.

I am not sure most of the people on either side have taken the time to try to understand WHY they take the stands they take because both sides seem to me to focus more on to me to focus more on screaming insults at each other than facts. For different reasons maybe,but the end results are still the same,division,jealousy, and hatred. ALL eventually leading to war.

IF we can,let's try to limit the hatred to a slow boil,and see if we can have a discussion where ideas are presented where maybe both sides can meet and agree on something.

Yeah,I know,but it's worth trying.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

Offline FlaGator

  • Another Pilgrim
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5296
  • Reputation: +933/-31
  • Democracy can survive anything except Democrats
Re: Eugenics and Abortion
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2017, 07:20:33 AM »
I don't look at these two issues having any pros. Bother are murder and that basically ends the discussion. A happy face can not be put on a situation that leads to a murdered fetus.
"My enemy's enemy is the enemy I kill last."
Klingon Proverb.

Offline sneakypete

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
  • Reputation: +13/-4
Re: Eugenics and Abortion
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2017, 07:47:10 AM »
I don't look at these two issues having any pros. Bother are murder and that basically ends the discussion. A happy face can not be put on a situation that leads to a murdered fetus.

@FlaGator

Ok,fine. Please tell us where the middle ground exists. Where is the food going to come from to feed the unlimited fetuses that are born and then become children and adults that need to eat,be clothed,housed,given medical care,etc,etc,etc? Is Santa going to provide for all of that?

What are our options,other than killing each other to "prove" one side is right?
« Last Edit: June 27, 2017, 07:50:45 AM by sneakypete »
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

Offline Mr Mannn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14885
  • Reputation: +2646/-276
Re: Eugenics and Abortion
« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2017, 07:49:02 AM »
I don't look at these two issues having any pros. Bother are murder and that basically ends the discussion. A happy face can not be put on a situation that leads to a murdered fetus.
Yep that says it all. Murder has no place in govt policy. and govt has no place choosing who lives or dies.

socialists are all about murder. Here is the founder of modern socialism, Bernard Shaw. Shaw advocates the murder of all who cannot justify their existence
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-Ljkoh_vmE[/youtube]
 
« Last Edit: June 27, 2017, 07:51:28 AM by Mr Mannn »

Offline sneakypete

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
  • Reputation: +13/-4
Re: Eugenics and Abortion
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2017, 07:55:24 AM »
Yep that says it all. Murder has no place in govt policy.

socialists are all about murder. Here is the founder of modern socialism, Bernard Shaw. Here Shaw advocates the murder of all who cannot justify their existence
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-Ljkoh_vmE[/youtube]

@Mr Mannn

Do you not understand ANYTHING about governments? Murder is half of government does. Granted,the killing they do is in the name of protecting the people they are responsible for,but from the POV of their opponents,the winners are always murderers.

BTW,there were no bigger murderers in history than the Catholic Church,and they are still at it this very day. The only difference is today the Pope won't be seen pushing for war in public,while ignoring the actions of orders like the Mary Knollers.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

Offline FlaGator

  • Another Pilgrim
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5296
  • Reputation: +933/-31
  • Democracy can survive anything except Democrats
Re: Eugenics and Abortion
« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2017, 09:31:48 AM »
@FlaGator

Ok,fine. Please tell us where the middle ground exists. Where is the food going to come from to feed the unlimited fetuses that are born and then become children and adults that need to eat,be clothed,housed,given medical care,etc,etc,etc? Is Santa going to provide for all of that?

What are our options,other than killing each other to "prove" one side is right?

My point is there is no middle ground. Murder is murder. Now you point out feeding and taking care of the children, that will be the responsibility of the parent(s). This is how it has been since life began on Earth. People have been having babies and finding ways to take care of them long before abortion was a socially acceptable response to an unexpected pregnancy.  Legal abortion is a fairly recent thing in the history of mankind. Abortion right now is no different than child sacrifice of the past. Now instead of killing our children to appease the volcano gods, or the famine gods we murder them to appease the god of comfort and ease. Children are sucked out of the womb as a sacrifice to the gods of convenience and easy answers.

What are our options you ask? They are the same as they have always been. Don't **** someone if you are not prepared to deal with the consequences. If a baby is created then take responsibility for your choices and do what is right, take care of the life you created.  From a certain perspective I am pro-choice. I just feel the choice needs to be made at some point before a life is on the line.
"My enemy's enemy is the enemy I kill last."
Klingon Proverb.

Offline sneakypete

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
  • Reputation: +13/-4
Re: Eugenics and Abortion
« Reply #6 on: June 27, 2017, 05:14:14 PM »
Quote
My point is there is no middle ground. Murder is murder. Now you point out feeding and taking care of the children, that will be the responsibility of the parent(s). This is how it has been since life began on Earth. People have been having babies and finding ways to take care of them long before abortion was a socially acceptable response to an unexpected pregnancy.

@FlaGator

Are you you claiming you are unaware of mothers killing their children in times of famines? This was still happening in some areas of the world as recently as the 20th Century.
The most famous and publicized instances were probably in China,where women would leave their newborns laying on the ground to starve to death or be eaten by animals  because she had no milk to feed them and had to use her strength to stay alive herself to help her other children.

Are you seriously trying to claim that aborting that child is more brutal than leaving it to do of exposure or be killed by hungry animals like rats?


 

You have no interest in discussion,only preaching dogma.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

Offline FlaGator

  • Another Pilgrim
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5296
  • Reputation: +933/-31
  • Democracy can survive anything except Democrats
Re: Eugenics and Abortion
« Reply #7 on: June 27, 2017, 08:23:18 PM »
Quote
Are you you claiming you are unaware of mothers killing their children in times of famines? This was still happening in some areas of the world as recently as the 20th Century.
The most famous and publicized instances were probably in China,where women would leave their newborns laying on the ground to starve to death or be eaten by animals  because she had no milk to feed them and had to use her strength to stay alive herself to help her other children.

Are you seriously trying to claim that aborting that child is more brutal than leaving it to do of exposure or be killed by hungry animals like rats?

First of all were did I clam that I was unaware of mothers killing their children in times of famine. You are erecting a straw man argument that is irrelevant to the comment that I made. I said murder is wrong regardless of the reason and abortion is murder. Now there is a difference between murder and killing but that difference doesn't come in to play here. We are talking about aborting the unborn not the murder of living children. Let us stick to one topic at a time. Abortion is murder. Your previous points about how life might be horrible for the child if he or she is born is pointless. At the time the child is delivered no one know what the future has in store. The child might be born in to famine and then the famine ends and the child grows up well fed and happy. Maybe the mother marries a rich man and the child grows up never in want for anything.

For the sake of argument you put forth only the negative possibilities and ignore the rest. Does one avoid marriage because the spouse may die of cancer? Does a person refuse a job because he or she might fail at it and be homeless? Do you refuse love because you might end up with a broken heart? Opting to murder a child based on an uncertain outcome makes the decision even more heinous. "I must murder you my child because life may be hard for you."
"My enemy's enemy is the enemy I kill last."
Klingon Proverb.

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Eugenics and Abortion
« Reply #8 on: June 28, 2017, 08:41:46 AM »
I see and have seen passionate as well as sometimes intelligent discussions about these issues for years,but NEVER see any pros to oppose the cons.

So I am going to state some in order to start a discussion where the OTHER side of the arguments is also stated.

Oh, joy. I can hardly wait.  :whatever:

Quote
We all know the anti-eugenics and anti-abortion points,and they ALL seem to be based entirely on emotions and religious beliefs. I am NOT claiming those are bad reasons,just trying to state what *I* think are the basic facts.

Did you ever stop to think that human beings - especially those who have experienced the joy of a live child in their arms - are CONSTRUCTED of that same "emotion" that you appear to ridicule, despite your claim to the contrary? And then you, in your sheer arrogance, spout what *YOU* "think are the basic facts." But OK - let's walk down this road. I'd like to hear more of what YOU think are "basic facts".

Quote
The Eugenics people base their intellectual (mostly unspoken) argument on some pretty solid facts,namely that there is a finite amount of resources available on the planet,and the sick,the lame,the stupid,and the lazy use up more than their fair share and contribute nothing in return in a modern world where grunt labor has very little value to societies,and has less value with each passing year.

I have no illusions here about your slant. You seem to extol the premise that "resources" are "limited." That plays into a special kind of emotion that is borne of certain "scientists" who claim that without them, mankind is doomed. No, you didn't use those words, but that is your (and the "scientists'") stranglehold on those who dare not think for themselves.

Now, let's discuss what kind of "resources" are limited. Water? Oil? Coal? Food? I'll agree that the hydrocarbon-based energy resources are limited since they took tens of thousands of years to develop - but then again, what kind of technology does it take to leverage those resources out of the ground? How cheaply can that be done? What is the cost, and are we prepared to pay that cost?

Drinking water can be extracted from the sea. The Saudis do it all the time.

Food? When it gets right down to it, we haven't even begun to explore this issue, largely because of culture biases and the fact that resources in providing that food are plentiful enough. And getting better.

Quote
In addition there are birth rates to consider,and no one can argue that the most productive and educated societies produce fewer babies than the ignorant and backwards societies,therefore creating a situation where unless things change radically there will be a tiny minority of the world population that will essentially be working and denying themselves the joys of larger families and more productive nations in order to provide food,shelter,clothing,medical care,comfort,and entertainment for a massive population of people who are little more advanced than cave men,and who have no interest in advancing any further or even taking care of themselves because the advanced and industrious people's and nations will take care of them.

Here we've arrived at your basic point. Humankind has "classes". Those who are fortunate enough to be born into the so-called "productive and educated societies" are cursed to support the "cavemen". **** you, you arrogant prick. Don't try to tell me that you don't think this way yourself. Nobody would even pretend to think this way unless they do already.

What you and others who think like you fail to realize is that there will always be the "cavemen" and others less fortunate than others. What you would do, then, is simply eradicate that segment of humankind that presents an inconvenience for you. Much easier to then count your 30 pieces of silver, eh? Asshole.  :whatever:

Quote
The planet Earth is a closed system and there can be no question about there being a finite amount of resources available,regardless of how many people need or demand those resources for themselves. The abortion and eugenics people don't seem to want to say this out loud,but you don't have to have a Doctorate in Sociology to understand that at some point the needy will outnumber the providers by a massive percentage of the world's population because they are breeding like rabbits while the providers are limiting their family sizes in order to provide more comfort and stability.

"Closed system?" In what way? Your thinking is clearly narrow-minded to the point that you completely fail to consider technology and how that technology continually breeds more and better access to resources that we hadn't even considered before. For example, we continually find oil resources that were previously unattainable. To the point that reserves are triple what they used to be. Even bullshit energy sources like solar are becoming cheaper and easier - though still as ugly - than ever.

Quote
IF you accept this projection as an indisputable truth,and given human nature it sure seems to be an indisputable truth,we will eventually arrive at a point where the necessities of life as well as the luxuries are running out,and the mobs will revolt and demand ALL the necessities as well as the luxuries be given to them instead of kept for themselves by the people responsible for creating and producing them,and that is when the violent revolution will happen that will virtually take the planet back to the Stone Age as the humans that are little more than animals murder off the productive people in order to get the luxuries they want.

I accept NOTHING as an indisputable truth - because those "truths" are constructed of distortions and half-truths, most of the time. And your mob rule fear installation is geared toward those who cannot think for themselves. Congratulations. You've become the poster child for the DUmbasses.

Quote
I am not real sure how well I have stated the POV of the Eugenics and Abortion people because they never seem to be interested in discussing the WHY's of their POV.

 ...the rest snipped except to say that the poster wants us to believe that THEY and not HE are the Eugenicists and Abortionists are they that wantonly murder and abort and otherwise put themselves in a position of who receives life and who doesn't....

Sneaky Pete - I have no idea who the **** you are or what you pretend to believe. Couldn't be less interested in that. All I know is that your premise is alarmingly transparent. You write an expose that supposedly asks questions, but in your zeal to answer them you reveal your real leanings.

**** you, asshole. Murder is murder. Human life is precious. Get used to that idea, and you just might be able to look at yourself in the mirror and accept the result.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2017, 08:44:14 AM by Eupher »
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline sneakypete

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
  • Reputation: +13/-4
Re: Eugenics and Abortion
« Reply #9 on: June 28, 2017, 05:32:47 PM »


With all due respect,eat shit and die.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Eugenics and Abortion
« Reply #10 on: June 28, 2017, 09:40:36 PM »
With all due respect,eat shit and die.

:lmao:

That's all you've got. A poignant ESAD.  :rotf:
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.