"Republican “church-goers” suddenly decided that Trump’s lack of church attendance was irrelevant, and that his *****-grabbing remarks were simply good, clean, locker-room fun. The “religious right” suddenly determined that a thrice-married, self-proclaimed serial adulterer was an outstanding model of those “good Christian family values” they have longed-for in a president – hallelujah, amen."
1) His "******- grabbing remarks" were made way back in 2005. Furthermore, nobody, including Christians, like Trump for having made such comments.
2) Trump may have been a crude jerk, but most Christians, myself included, would rather have a crude jerk than someone like Hillary who is openly opposed to the Christian faith, and would have undoubtedly pushed anti- Christian legislation. At a women's conference not long before she started her 2016 campaign, she loudly stated that people's religious beliefs "Have to be changed" in order to advance her rabidly pro- abortion agenda. Her infamous "Basket of Deplorables" speech was a clear insult to Christians, considering it took place at a New York LGBT event and included her specifically referring to those "Deplorables" as both "Homophobic" and "Islamophobic". Also, the very day before she delivered that speech, her buddy Martin Castro made the statement that "The phrases ‘religious liberty’ and ‘religious freedom’ … remain code words for discrimination, intolerance, racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, Christian supremacy or any form of intolerance.” Again, Christians generally would be more comfortable with a president who has said crude things and has a less- than- savory personal life than a president who openly insulted their beliefs and would seek to "Change" them in order to force Christians by law to act against the teachings of their faith and basic dictates of their consciences.
3) Even leaving aside her rampant Christophobia,the Hildabeest's rampant corruption and dishonesty aren't exactly consistent with Christian values either.
